???
The US gets the F-14A and B, only the IRIAF was banned.
5 Likes
Aight someone must be reading my moaning about the rolands because I just got into a match and now the flakpanzers were firing Roland 3s.
Seems like the rear flakpanzers get Roland 3s while all the other flakpanzers don’t for some reason now.
there better but not a crazy difference like R27ER
bain of my existence are the OSAs as they have double the range of the FLak panzers so there impossble to dodge as there saclos which is so annoying it be way easier if they where actual toptier FOX-3s cause you could actually multipath them
eh depends it accelrates like F111A its not powerful engine i think the MIG-23MLD is a far better nuke runner hence why its limited to a 250 if it had the 500 the SU24 would have zero purpose
man i wish they filled red side with some AI so i could actually get a game for US. its been an hour cant seem to score a game
America is bad in the event, but also in GRB, and probably in ARB as well.
Tbh, if you’re not Russia, you’re bad.
You need to spam the join button, works better imo than sitting and waiting
thats what i do, every 2 minutes i reset
hey, is anyone having trouble with the aim7m’s?
Below top tier the US is almost always the best nation in air RB. Other nations are competitive (and sometimes better/even more dominant), but the US is the best overall.
1 Like
sparrows are a known garbage missile
1 Like
Nobody plays ARB anyway.
Wdym??
I think this part is playing the victim.
U.S. Air Branch has a generally good lineup below the top ranks.
1 Like
I mean, much more people play GRB than ARB.
Even if it is true
-It isn’t ‘nobody plays ARB’
-It doesn’t invalidate that the US has a generally good lineup for ARB.
For example, Britain Rank 7 is a literal minefield, and many minor nation’s post-ww2 era subsonic jet lineups are screwed as heck.
Even though russian bias is ass,
USA isn’t BAD.
It just failed to be #1.
Not being #1 out of 10 isn’t ‘bad’
3 Likes
-It doesn’t invalidate that the US has a generally good lineup for ARB.
If we consider that the large majority of players play GRB, there isn’t really a point of being the META of ARB.
You need CAS capabilities, not air capabilities, in this game.
And the CAS capabilities, we all know who has it.
In your theory, if we push it to the end, we will reach
‘We need to remove naval and ARB because many players play GRB.’
That is a hot take.
No offence, you are throwing American Tech Tree’s good parts into the bin, just because you want to play victim.
Cherrypicking the samples.
In this game, you need different capabilities in different game modes.
Yes, about this part, I wonder why we Brits need to have gelded Brimstone while those soviets are having Kh38.
I hate it.
But It doesn’t mean that Americans/Brits are BAD.
1 Like
In your theory, if we push it to the end, we will reach
‘We need to remove naval and ARB because many players play GRB.’That is a hot take.
No, why ?
I’m not saying it’s not important to be the META of ARB, I’m saying that as there is an actual large majority of the player base playing GRB, it is more important to have more performant CAS, than more air capabilities for ARB.
I’m not ashamed to say America has actual good air capabilities, I’m not cherrypicking at all. I’m actually bothered by the fact to say Russia has the best air, because it’s not true. They have the best CAS. I’m just saying that in GRB, Russia shines more because of their good CAS.
Yes, about this part, I wonder why we Brits need to have gelded Brimstone while those soviets are having Kh38.
I hate it.
But It doesn’t mean that Americans/Brits are BAD.
It means there is a bias towards Russia. And that in comparaison, other nations are less competitive.
You said it yourself, Brits have gelded Brimstone or whatever, and Russia has W Kh38. Doesn’t seem right in terms of balance.
I just wonder why the heck you are invalidating every single point that the US may be META.
Just for playing victim? Or Spamming russian bias replys?
Are there solid statistics to prove your take? Or just your assumption.
Also, if we consider it is true just for arguing’s sake
It cannot be a reason to ignore American superiority in ARB.
So, you want GRB bias instead of Russian bias?
Every gamemode is important, and it is NOT MORE IMPORTANT to have a more performant CAS than more air capabilities for ARB in general.
You are thinking like that you are GRB main.
If we ignore the fact USA are generally being meta in ARB except the top ranks, then they will be meta forevermore unless powercreep comes up and crushes the former meta.
It also does not seem right in terms of balance.
No no no. You are cherry-picking. Maybe not intended.
But if you exclude non-GRB for the balancing decision, it will eventually be cherry-picking the points.
Yes, Russia probably has better cas than us in the top rank GRB
But it doesn’t mean we are less competitive. We still can ruin Lavochkin’s day with Spittie.
1 Like