I just wonder why the heck you are invalidating every single point that the US may be META.
Just for playing victim? Or Spamming russian bias replys?
Because they’re just not the META in GRB ??
Maybe in ARB, but again, not the META either in terms of CAS capabilities.
It cannot be a reason to ignore American superiority in ARB.
Who said that ? I’m just talking about the CAS capabilities here, not the air capabilities.
So, you want GRB bias instead of Russian bias?
Every gamemode is important, and it is NOT MORE IMPORTANT to have a more performant CAS than more air capabilities for ARB in general.
You are thinking like that you are GRB main.
If we ignore the fact USA are generally being meta in ARB except the top ranks, then they will be meta forevermore unless powercreep comes up and crushes the former meta.
It also does not seem right in terms of balance.
Because people mainly play WT for GRB, not ARB. It’s very unlikely a dude only plays ARB for 1500 hours straight.
Plus, you just said yourself that the US weren’t the META at top tier ARB ? So I’m guessing Russia is also the META, even at top tier ARB ?
So can we say they also have the bias there ? Unless it’s the french or other european that have the META at top tier ARB.
No no no. You are cherry-picking. Maybe not intended.
But if you exclude non-GRB for the balancing decision, it will eventually be cherry-picking the points.
I never had that kind of conversation before.
For me, WT is mainly GRB. Because GRB = ground + heli + jets + CAS. That’s why people rather play GRB than ARB solely.
Of course I’m always talking about GRB. I don’t even believe russian mains care about having the META in ARB tbh lol.
Yes, Russia probably has better cas than us in the top rank GRB
But it doesn’t mean we are less competitive.
If they have better CAS, then we’re less competitive in terms of CAS… it’s the definition of being + or - competitive