1.1 K/D is nothing special mate ;)
Seeing how it’s better than more than half of the playerbase it’s special enough, " mate ".
2 Likes
It is really not.
If You want to still blame ‘ulq’ on how badly You play then it is a skill issue. I was playing on ULQ and without it, and couldn’t really see the difference as at longer distances there is none.
1 Like
It actually is, so your denial card is objectively worthless. Find a better argument.
The rest of your post isn’t worth reading.
1 Like
Do I really need to again show how I can turn off 2 settings and have everything else on max and see the same as a person on ULQ?
2 Likes
I don’t need you to show me anything. I do not expect nor trust you to be objective in any of your " evidence " displays.
1 Like
So no matter what actual screanshoots/videos I’m going to show, You won’t accept it because they don’t go with Your opinion.
Great to hear that and good to know for any further discussions
2 Likes
Not from you, no. From a select few others, sure.
And it has nothing to do with what lines it falls upon, but solely that you’ve proven yourself unworthy of being trusted or heeded when it comes to objective facts.
1 Like
‘I’ll trust only those who think as I do!’
Sure buddy, there is no point in further discussion.
3 Likes
You can try to twist my words all you want but not only are you still objectively wrong but also coming off as a clown. However I agree that this exchange is over.
1 Like
The problem is that I’m not wrong.
I have already provided on the old forum on how You can turn off 2 settings and get even better results than on ULQ.
I have already explained how even if You ban ULQ, You will still have problem with anyone on lower graphic as You are as there is always some ‘advantage’. The difference between film settings nad medium ones is the same as difference between medium and lower settings (not ULQ). There will always be a problem such as ‘ULQ’ as long as the whole graphics don’t change.
But sure, belive that by removing ULQ Your skill will get better.
4 Likes
this, I just play with medium, turn grass off, lower tree range render, that’s it, i can see further.
1 Like
i could use some popcorn or chips reading this.
The conversation went from a actual meaningful debate about bushes in-game, to a full on insult battle…
2 Likes
what in god name did i just read…
It’s definitely an advantage to have bushes on your tanks. They can be used to hide weak-spots and generally conceal your tanks if only a passing glance is directed toward you. Experienced players know this and so does Gaijin, which is why they sell them. That said, they’re DIRT cheap to buy AND you can get them for free through the Warbond Shop by completing special tasks. I don’t see an issue with including them.
What would be nice is if bushes could be burned or blown off tanks with HE shells or flamethrowers.
5 Likes
I obtained a free bush this last warbonds shop. Thanks WT!
1 Like
Did same in this season. Got big olives ones.
No point to remove it as everyone can obtain it.
Bushes are still considered a pay to win item as you pay money for its advantages. Even when you can earn them in the War Bond Shop, you still have to pay money to be able to earn the chance to buy bushes. Cheapness doesn’t change the advantage a player gets versus a free to play player.
1 Like
You don’t have to pay money to get to buy bushes.
You have to finish special tasks and level up your warbond shop. That is all.
2 Likes
And WT allows the purchase of bushes without paying for Battle Pass and WT does this enough to cover the the majority of the multiple vehicles in each match? 75%? 50%? 25%?
1 Like