Uh yeah compared to my stats you’re just slightly above average
and that has zero relevancy here
another red hering 8nstead of having a proper argument
you are complianing that a plane is suffering because of a more advanced type of missile
and your genious solution to that problem is to make a whole group of planes suffer because a more advanced type of missile
what a hypocrite
Germany:
I think you should move the CL-13MK.6 to 9.3 since the F-2 variant is just worse in every way other than guns. CL-13Mk.6 also gets 2x Aim-9Bs.
USA:
The F-80C should go to 8.0 as a result of the decompression of low-tier jets, and the F9F-5 should go to 8.3 too.
Italy:
MB-326B should go to 7.0 and / or lose its air spawn in ARB.
MB-326K should probably go to 7.3 and / or lose its air spawn in ARB too.
MiG-17PF is Lim-5P so it should also go to 9.0 then.
All:
Lower all the A-4s (other than the ones with CMs) by 0.3 since they aren’t really good
Israel:
A-4N / AYIT should probably go to 10.0 purely because of the fact that it has a good engine, turns decently and has access to 2x Aim-9Ds + 2x Shafrir 2s.
The Mirage 2000C-S5 being at 12.3 to 12.7 was a questionable change when it happened last year. It was probably an understandable change back then but now since theres plenty of new vehicles at top tier it’s not really justified since it has to deal with too many missiles when uptiered. There are players better than me who would probably share my understanding.
1 Like
you are a hypocrite through and through
just dont try to argue if can only do so in bad faith
it makes you only look like a clown
So we should make the game unbalanced because of your personal strife with me lol
says the one asking for making the game more unbalanced by advocating for compression instead of decompression
yet another red hering ontop of another hypocritical statment
Both of those Mirages are the same aircraft, the amount of compression you’re worried about is negligible.
if compression isnt an issue then the m2k is fine at 12.7
I can understand K, but why the hell touching B in air RB, it has 2 gunpod Brownings and gunpod miniguns as offensives?
It turns better than the K in both instantaneous and sustained, though it’s slower, compresses at higher speeds more (although it still has better instantaneous turn rate at those speeds than the K variant), and doesn’t get the DEFAs.
For reference with Yak-15 too (which is also a decent turnfighting jet at 6.7):
Its main drawback is the firepower but I don’t think it would entirely stop it from getting a lot of frags.
Your reasoning is because of countermeasures and thats just not good enough. Somehow it’s better than the F/A-18A in your eyes which is ridiculous
putting words in my mouth ontop of another red hering
you are arguing in bad faith
and you cant come up with a proper argument without resulting to arguing in bad faith
funnily i said the they should be at the same br
and that is 12.7
Theres a bunch of aircraft that carry IRCCM missiles around 12.0 - 12.7 so you’re just wishing they all go up regardless of how they perform. Gaijin is not going to do that, so why even entertain yourself suggesting those things
another red hering ontop of putting words in my mouth again
funny because the M2K is performing fine at 12.7 when looking at its statistics especially compared to other 12.7 aircraft in the last month
it only has the 4th highest kd and 6th highest win rate out of all 12.7 aircraft
That’s just for 12.7 and the S4 is also ranked very high in the same BR bracket, they perform exactly the same.
so there is no issue with the S4 moving up to 12.7
To fight bunch of aircraft loaded with active radar missiles with low countermeasures? lmao
i thought the difference in CMs dosent matter
your argument is falling apart
because it was nonsens from the start
You’re missing F-18 without bol, worse RWR, and no HMD at 14.0
Its called compression and the devs worry about muh que times
1 Like