It’s a 13.7 in sim…? Nor did I say it was bad. Don’t put words in my mouth.
He said it was 13.7 in Arb… not 13.0…
yeah i skimmed over missed those three letters assumed it was all ARB
But even still. R27s are kinda easy to dodge now adays
ive played this one and it used to be good then you some really strong planes at the BR for example BISON R73 and R27S when mig 29 at 12.7 get it also why would you make it same br as premium with way better missiles not to mention 13.3 uptiers are a massive pain
R27ERs are like the only FOX-1 that can beat AIM-120As no other can do to there insane kinematics literally broke the game when added so it be able to face things like F4EJ or F4JUKS etc is INSANE
pythons go mach 3.5 btw and AIM-9Ls only go 2.5 and they pull more Gs the Netz should always be .3 higher
From everyone I’ve heard from, in both arb and air sim, the F-18s are nasty, and honestly P2W. Sim is especially bad if you aren’t full up on F-18s on your team.
1 Like
i cant speak for sim but F/A-18A is strong in arb but not to a point it breaks game the C gets vastly better missiles cause DATA link
Just like aim-120s, aim-9m, and aim-54s broke the game.
Given in sim, you can wait till your “top” F-18s vs Su-39s and other things is just a joke.
I’ve never seen a plane clear lobbied out as quick as the F-18s.
Given the fact Redfor is always outnumbered as is, typically in 2:1 fashion, that just put the nail in the coffin for that br range for sim.
It’s like taking a Su-27, and strapping it with slightly worse missiles, but giving them better abilities.
1 Like
the whole trees need atleast .3 in br separation