little typo in your ATAS report
all of those are perfect, thank you so much
Fixed.
Also worth noting that that there is a claim that the ?Charge Diameter?, of the IBFS is 143mm. So for the patent, the 120mm CD of Figure. 18 should be assumed to be an undercount, but well representative of performance (Sans Tandem, Precursor charge).
Edit: changed link above!
Ok so the Penetration issue is being handled internally, ive sent some additional sources.
1 Like
Hopefully It includes the increased fragmentation of the IBFS warhead, over the current Hellfire’s Tandem warhead.
heres some videos that might help a report for JAGM lofting
2 Likes
Now when i think about it in all videos of the agm-179MR the missile almost always hits from weird angles and in Wrong spots. Like the side of the turret cheek, the barrel, the track and so on and so on
thats because spike warhead sucks, so they had to add some random chance on where it hits so it didnt always get eaten by a tanks armor
also effected by it under lofting so it was hitting armor at its worst angle
1 Like
It should hit the top of the roof
it should but gaijin hasnt implemented proper top attack for anything that isnt hammer or now LMUR
6 Likes
Could always be worse, the RAH-66 is stuck with the AGM-114B, because?
2 Likes
OP updated with the second CMDS report and flight model changes
What the hell…
Could have at least let us equip the SAL ones on the outer pylon , so that the maximum load is
16 SAL , or 8 SAL , 8 IR . I would be very happy with that option
7 Likes
That was a fast turn around, only took 2 minutes between being lodged and closed.
“Developers don’t plan to add more than 8 missiles for now.”
4 Likes
1 minute from posting and it was taken down
“No more than 8 missiles”
They are laser, not IR , maybe he didnt read right?
1 Like
Probably the mention of -MR in the title, Isn’t the SAL intended to be the baseline AGM-179, not the MR version?
Cant even modify the report now, and making another one would probably give me a warning