Thats exactly the bit I was quoting.
Per the brochure, if it can fire the 114 or the 114L, it can fire a JAGM, requiring only a software update to do so.
1 Like
ah my bad i misread what you said, i thought you said anything that could use JAGM for some reason
1 Like
Same
I do wonder where people talking about k38 being fake are these days when americans get something made up :D
Regardless all of it is made up marketing. Rockets are very simple so we can very easily simulate them from known points (JAGM being just a hellfire motor) and i did in the other thread.
Speed and range are pure fabrication (its only 1.8kg wet mess more) with the only improvement being maybe more aerodynamic nose. But it should have delta V of the lighter hellfire
JAGM-MR has a new extended motor that physically makes the missile longer thats where the extra range comes from
Regular JAGM Is the one that kept the hellfire motor and as such is still only 8km
4 Likes
wdym?
JAGM-MR was at least tested, unlike some stuff.
3 Likes
JAGM-MR is 1.8kg heaver, which i shown exactly by adding 1.8kg propellant mass. That makes it just match hellfire performance (- drag that it has lower so it will go further). Rest is just flight profile
now, simulate different warhead and not only
Ok so after a preponderance of the evidence, New report;
2 Likes
Its already a water gun… 3.7 to 2.7 is even worse.
2.7 is explosive weight for main warhead. You have also precursor.
Ah, that’s good, i was under the impression the JAGM will get the CM502 Treatment of being about as powerful as a stone thrown by a child.
Still hoping for the JAGM-MR to come to the AH-1Z , they are compatible after all , and if im not mistaken, unlike the 64E, the AH-1Z can only use 8.
Proxy for the 30MM is still something i am hopeful for, and maybe someone digs up some better variants of the ATAS?
Either that, or the snail is merciful and the Proxy APKWS makes it to dev Community Bug Reporting System
3 Likes
It’s already a stone.
TBH jagm couldve been fine, if gaijin didnt change their rules regarding 170mm rule.
If someone wants to help with the penetration report, please search for papers regarding the use of molybdenum as HEAT warhead liner, its comparison with copper, etc.
im onto something
2 Likes
Sort of reported
there is an argument to be made in that patent I referred to earlier, it shows the comparison between a “Tulip” and “Trumpet” shaped liner, Refer to Figure. 18
Also can be found in
ADA278191 Liner material consideration
ADA341708 Determination of the Yield Strength of a Molybdenum Jet
Just wanted to send this…