First of all, this resolution for PNVS part, not for M-TADS as i can see.
OP updated with some reports on visual stuff
The rotoblade thing will probably be denied so you should give them some evidence
I was talking about the bug report
It is from main rotor blade report.
But i don’t understand what u mean with that pic? I can see the bugreport
The bug report contains information (photos, pdf files, something else) that you don’t see.
1 Like
Im just curious but couldn’t the uk receive Australia’s AH-64E Apache which looks the exact same as America’s one ??
They would just receive their own
they dont have JAGM MR
unless gaijin decides to give it to them because limits like that only apply to US stuff
No way🤩
1 Like
yeah i did not expect that
still would’ve need more happy if they fixed the issues from the list
2 Likes
Sounds cool.
I wish it had better damage tbh
1 Like
You are greedy, 16 AGMs each rated at 16km with F&F capabilities
1 Like
All in the name of realism BABY.
Guess what, the more stuff that gets added the more ridiculously good the loadouts are going to get.
That “realism” ended the second it became a game, there is too much stuff, some are more balanced than others, imagine balancing 2 balls, that’s easy, now try balancing 100 all at the same time
It can’t be that realistic, some battles would be a sure loss
The most disadvantaged tech trees for a long time have been the ones that had no FNF while anyone with a eurocopter, spikes, or KA, had a distinct advantage. This evens things up for at least one nation
They still pride them selves for being realistic, even with the balancing. For ounce the united states gets anything modern and the forums freak out.
2 Likes