Best option if no FnF is to simply upgrade them to a later version but retain SAL to keep them competitive with KH-38 and AASM. But Brimstone 1s would be fine Vs earlier AGMs in terms of balance. Tornado Gr4 already has the PGMs but the Typhoon has no alternative
I do still believe though the best way to achieve better balance is to just remove IOG from AGMs
Yeah… Which they can given enough launch speed and alt. But I think any attempt to argue for longer guidance time for them has failed due to lack of primary sources.
The last I heard, gunjob tried the argument that Brimstone 2s upgraded the motor but not the battery and yet achieves approx 60km range. Therefore the 1s should not be as limited by the battery
battery times for many AGMs are, IMO, given arbitrary values or hard cut-off points with respect to distance travelled.
mostly because TV guided weapons can point lock 20km but not all of them can travel 20km so the battery is a way to model self destruction for such AGMs… unfairly in some cases
Only other one that jumps to mind is the year ISH old report for Harrier Gr7 to get AGM-65s on the outer pylons bringing their total up to 6, if that counts
Or AJ168 getting a totally fictional guidance method
No, not even, the system is not at all the same for shooting, the way the TV-guided Martel works requires a lot of electronics
PGMs are weapons used on export Mirages but have never been tested or fired by French Mirages and otherwise the 2000D RMV should not have access to the AASM
Yeah, I always considered the F-16s good CAS not because of the AGM-65s they carried but because of the quantity, platform handling and multirole ability. On anything I have with them like the GR7, I barely touch them