They go in parabolic trajectory once they are close enough. Should work just fine against radar vehicles or single vehicle systems which have to be somewhat exposed to scan surroundings efficiently.
This is for only for agms, and applies to every missile with combined tv/ir+gnss.
Who are you trying to misinform?
unless you are trying to mislead people…
War Thunder developers are perfectly capable of implementing LOAL. They have already done so for ARH missiles, for the Japanese SAM SPAA, for the IRIS-T SLM, they have done so for SAL missiles, and even IR AGMs that transition from point lock to track lock AFTER LAUNCH do this.
1 Like
Nothing exists for NATO that matches KH38?
Not completing the LOAL cannot be used as an excuse. If this were a truly effective Russian weapon, it would have been in the appropriate state for the game environment when it was released. Compromise and tolerance are unacceptable. They must be improved! They attempted to reject the provision of AGM114L by citing balance issues, refuse to provide the corresponding functions for the LOAL weapon on the grounds that the LOAL function has not been completed., and to reject the supply of these missiles by claiming that the anti-radar missiles are unable to effectively attack the current air defense systems. Each of these items has the potential to pose a threat to Russian weapons.
But were these standards really strictly adhered to in the Russian weapons? The 9K127 missile has the remarkable feature of being able to automatically select between the VT fuse and the impact fuse before hitting the target. KH38 is capable of flying at low altitudes at speeds exceeding 2 Mach. The SPO15 radar warning system is a completely incorrect function. The never-installed radar and weapon systems of the YAK141. The non-existent “line break repair” function of R27ER. Are they really balanced? Did they truly achieve the expected performance as intended? Could it be that they are missing some valuable features because the related game functions have not been fully completed?
Kh59mk is already in game with that capability irl, and it lacks it still lacks it in game while being a russian weapon, so whatever you just said is a big lie
1 Like
Russia would get kh31 which is a mach 3 ramjet ARM, and would ironically turn out somewhat better than agm88 with the given stats
got Notabug’ed
You can’t launch ir/tv agms with gnns only to who are you lying?
Never said they were not able to implement loal.
if you see the OP
he says
Just like how KH-38ML works
so idk why ur so confused about this.
the issue ISNT that they can or cannot implement this
but the issue is that they HAVENT DONE IT YET
None of your arguments make any sense, same could be said for alot of other systems. keep thinking that you’re hated ig. also litteraly not a single ir/tv agm/atgm can be launched by gnns, missing weaponry is a thing for every country, ex: mica NG, hermes a, pl-15, vikhr-M, lmur-er, KH-38MA
1 Like
also ‘line break repair’ is not even only for the r27er, it’s also for the aim7p, yak 141 is a prototype, you wan’t it without any weapons, no radar no gun or whatever? plus in the end it’s a game. many prototype’s have ‘fictional weapons’
later AGM-88 have range on it, but Kh-31 has a slight speed advantage
and the kh31 has a larger warhead.
68kg vs 87kg, both will destroy AA
I’m aware. just that the kh31 has an advantage there.
1 Like
Regarding variants, i wonder which one will gaijin add, because early variants wont have multiband seeker, atleast for early kh31
probably early ones for older russian jets, and then newer ones for Su-30SM2, and maybe a future Su-35
1 Like
gib mig31 for sead.