How ? Its not search mode in the game that you locked something in TWS is another story.
Well smart guy that was your idea bringing 7.5 reload for ZTZ99 which was 4 years ago as PGZ09 on same br with ZSU-23-4.
Well lets give it to J-10 and see how happy you will be.
As the previous guy said,
halved ammo is good XD
Ok, as video dose not work for you, please show me what i am locking here.
Want me to drown my TADS, so it changes from PPI to B-Scope?
But why do i even try, you should be able to test drive the buk, check for yourself.
J10 already using the AL31 pretty much the same as the SU27, if you say initially SU27 using AL21 and not typing mistake, I can garantee you I played SU27 in first division it was equiped AL31 at very begining in this game with similar thrust as now
nope, 4V still 8.0, as well as gepard 8.3 now. My mistake Gaijin add 23-4M2 in BR 7.3, wow
the reason PGZ09 go 9.0 because gain AHEAD to fill the gap where the others are nearly using missile
Also, before 99 changed to 7.1 it exists for at least 2 years
AND IT IS USELESS TO WASTING MY TIME ON YOU, WHATEVER YOU SAY I AGREE, RUSSIA NEED TO BUFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
I don’t have time reviewing all the thread, so I will just make my one judgment, point if there is any problem
for BUK, it’s a different system, designed based on SARH missiles, so it has different structure and layout to modern systems. it’s not comparable.
and it’s search radar is poor, while you can’t just rely on the targeting radar. if any related, I will say it’s a example that we don’t need the big search radar for HQ-11
If you state Chinese strong, play it
I’ve seen tech trees got some good stuff and some bad, but for literally entire tech tree bad with just a few good vehicles even you got evidence to proof but nothing changed, for every single vehicle
you are not calling it racism, fine
And to make it work you need target it’s still not search mode in the game.
Go outside and breathe some fresh air.
honestly, now, most br is fine, just in top.
even top are fine in some terms, just don’t have “very op vehicles”, except Z-10me. and some things need repair, but these won’t change much.
No you dont, my videos literally show it, and you should be able to do it yourself. I can, so i dont see a reason why you cant.
Unless it is your intention to not do so, then there is nothing i can do about it.
BA11 still no IOG, but I’ll take it, never blame that
I know they should be some balance when the others are dont have it, its a game eventually
iog not so important to experience
some city and frost map its quite annoying, but most time its good, not blaming it
He havent got a BUK, just check the profile
Ik, but he has the Pantsir, so he can test drive it.
yep, too lazy for him to test or maybe should I teach him?
Never did it.
Chinese tree have M18, IS-2, T-34-85 with HMG, ZSU-57-2 with Proxi fuse, ISU-152, Object 211, ZTZ59A, AFT09 i don’t know about top tier but will highlight something that clearly good vehicle.
So many people wan’t to see Chinese tree just get deleted from game claiming that devs racist towards Chinese vehicles is nonsence.
apart of WZ305 and AFT09 (ZTZ59A is premium, they want money), the others just copied and pasted at lower tier, thats a fact, I am not arguing that, you think theyre good in other nation, fine as well as them in China
Then delete it since all data and performance where made up by your western’s propaganda, dont need them with prejudice exactly like you.
THE EQUIPMENTS ALWAYS THERE AND HOPEFULLY NOT BUT WE’LL SEE WHICH BETTER
Get a life.
Seems like someone need, not me
BTW lets make a bet:
If you ever know what is J16, when it release in WT it will never as good as SU30SM2’s (not equiped now until 2026) behaviour now, and that will proof my opinion again
Equipments proved their ability, 6:0 J10CE vs. Rafale, in the deep heart you dont want to admit it. For a individual people this called prejudice, but coming to a whole set with this prejudice, isn’t it called racism>
It honestly doesn’t matter whether the AA system is integrated. The matter is, while everyone except Chinese and Israeli TTs get at least one SAM system comprised of a whole battery, especially in Russia‘s case a battery with each launcher capable of searching and locking just like HQ-11, HQ-11 and SPYDER can only spawn one vehicle once, without the firepower the SAM batteries are capable of. At least in the case of HQ-11 there are evidences that support the point that the TELAR can link up with a TADS vehicle, a CIWS vehicle or TELs without radars. To make it worse, after such a blunder, the Snail tried to sugarcoat it by saying that the 11 is a highly integrated system so it doesn’t need multi-vehicle spawns, depriving it of its potential firepower as a battery. The same effect can now apply to SPYDER. You have an integrated MR-SAM battery with one TADS and multiple TELARs, and an “integrated” SMR-SAM TELAR that is denied its own TADS because “it’s a TEL integrated with a minor TADS.”
SMH.
