And yet you are harder to find so the chances that you will instantly die are lower than having to juggle 3 vehicles around. And while were at the BUK thing, its really a pretty dogshit system to begin with. I really dont know why youre crying over here over the BUK when its atleast in my opinion one of the worst of the multi vehicle systems to use.
Its massive, dies extremely easily thanks to the tubes, the TADS is useless, TELARs are not guaranteed to pick up target you can see and you have limited radar LOS with deadzone if you use TELARs only.
This makes no sense.
Separate also means easier to kill because more vehicles that need to be set up, a concept i doubt youll be capable of understanding it seems.
Speaking of arrogance, this entire “discussion” at this point is literally just “my toy isnt better than their toy” which is just so childish. But yes, go off queen. Do say how gaijin are racist against china.
The whole point is BUK got radar on the launcher it’s fine with separate, HQ11 isn’t, don’t be double standard
And you said separate not good, oh yeah? BUK can die 3 times even without TAR maximum for 1 spawn
Have you ever played both separate and all in one? It’s about fair, every nation got the similar thing, but Gaijin choose to not giving some
Youre saying this as if gaijin had some form of a hidden agenda against china despite the fact what happened recently with VT4 where i would very much argue that Gaijin actually favours chinese playerbase opinion more than some others.
So if you are saying that they are racist because the HQ11 is not up to your magical bullshit standards, you are the biggest manchild in here thinking that. Literally grow up.
China keeps getting new vehicles like pretty much every single update. But somehow despite that you guys still manage to cry your eyes out over your vehicles.
THE TELAR IS NOT THE SAME AS AN ALL IN ONE VEHICLE.
It isn’t but it has the TEL without radar version, they choose the radar one.
FAIR is not difficult to understand isn’t it?
BTW Chinese isn’t the major in this forum, the VT4 issue let’s say if you put UKR leopard 2 to USSR tech tree like that?
Now JP receive literally whole Southeast Asia, which all they invaded in WW2, so equivalent put all western tank into Germany is that satisfying you?
Every non-multivehicle SPAA is all-in-one. Bruh. Same way Elde, Ito, Flarakrad, Pantsir, ADATS or other vehicles are all in one. Your CSSA5 is an all in one vehicle. Having an all in one vehicle doesnt automatically make it worse than a multi vehicle SPAA. They each have their positives and negatives. Im really tired of writing this for the nth time.
The thing determining the effectiveness of an SPAA is not “is it multi vehicle or is it all in one” but rather the missiles, the radar and other factors.
The positives of multi vehicle SPAAs are that they can afford to lose one launcher at a hefty cost but are harder to set up because you have more vehicles to position.
The positives of AiO vehicles are that the set up is fast, they are generally harder to find since 3 vehicles tend to be easier to spot than just 1 and they are generally more compact with some exceptions.
Youre literally trying to change reality to conform to your view of “china suffers because gaijin is racist”
SPYDER was there at 3 versions before, meanwhile China was using HQ17
Now 3 versions after still just a all in one system came out, even it should originally with a CIWS
Spyder was always as an All-in-One in WT. Never a multivehicle. In reality there is a version of Spyder that has only launchers and a large radar search vehicle. (czech republic for example uses that version as an air defense system) And when spyder came out china has received CSSA5 in the very same update.
Did you ever play Chinese vehicles? I am confident to say that because I’ve got basically all top tier vehicles in the game, China tech tree is not as good as the others, not competitive
In effectivity? depends on system. Its definitely better than Elde98, TanSamKai, hell id say even the new Type03. And after the Fb10A got buffed with DL+IOG it has become a system that if youre doing CAS you cant just ignore.
It is very very far from being a bad SPAA.
Personally i view the CSSA5 as a chinese Pantsir that can hit you even if you broke LOS.