ADATS, what Gaijin got wrong

Attack the D point, visualized

5 Likes

I was going to write the bug report, but I believe it won’t go anywhere. In a similar bug report about ASRAD stabilization + ASRAD-R sight is not stabilised, it was marked as “not a bug” because “Stabilized sensor unit != Stabilized launcher.” In the case of ADATS, the module with sensors is stabilized, and there’s no mention of the launchers. Having only the sight stabilized would already be nice, regardless of whether the launcher is stabilized or not. Anyway, if someone wants to give it a try, feel free to report it.

3 Likes

Yea, that sure did happend…
Sadly they do consider weapon stabilization more important than the sight stabilization, even in a case like missile vehicles.

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT would it be possible to pass things like ADATS, ASRAD etc. to get stabilizer based on the sight stabilization, not launchers stabilization, as a suggestion (as in bug reports one)?

5 Likes

I’ve already reported the ADATS missing a gun stabilizer 3 months ago, TWICE, and both reports were ignored.

Spoiler

Line of Sight-Forward (Heavy) Surrogate Assessment cover 2



7 Likes

i might do it, gonna edit this if i do

edit: did

Is this a game limitation? Aren’t the sights linked to the main gun so if the sight is stabilized and the main gun isn’t, it would mean that the sight is “unstabilized” ?

Are there vehicles where the sight is independent from the main gun?

No, as of now devs need weapon to be stabilized, not sight. So if a tank has stabilized weapon, but not sight, it gets stab in game. If the sight has a stab, but weapon no, it does not get a stab.

4 Likes

even so, the 25mm should’ve also been stabilized and the only one unstabilized would be the missile launchers

1 Like

Missile fails to reach Mach 3, it peaked at 2.93 (end of 2s burn time) and instantly started to slow down
image

7 Likes

Thanks. I’ll try to add some sources to the MIM-146 rocket motor performance report later

Spoiler

SCHWEIZER SOLDAT 7/83 p. 17

The smokeless solid-fuel rocket motor accelerates the wingless missile to over Mach 3 (3700 km/h) within three seconds.

ASMZ 12/1984 p. 649

During the course of these trials, the main requirements for the missile, such as acceleration to a speed of over Mach 3 within approximately three seconds, flawless aerodynamic behavior throughout the entire flight duration, and smokeless combustion of the engine, were successfully demonstrated.

6 Likes

yeah, ouch, not gonna give it 60g

1 Like

they closed my report on the stabilized sights as the gun doesn’t have a stabilizer and both of which are connected…

so first the gun has to get it’s stabilizer, then the sights will be able to and not one without the other

1 Like

we should support this, otherwise the adats won’t receive either a stabilizer for sights or 25mm

2 Likes

I’ve had enough of these developers, f**king SHOOT ON THE MOVE capability apparently doesn’t mean what it literally is according to them, just pulling excuses out of nowhere

AFAIK the AMX-32 and 40 only have stabilized optics while having stabilized guns in-game, so the ADATS should receive it as well if I am correct

6 Likes

well they don’t want to give it for whatever reason, and it’s pissing me off now

sources after sources, they pull excuses out of thin air just to NOT buff nato vehicles because they’d be too op apparently…

1 Like

Why can’t they just make aiming sight stabilized (and force ADATS player to use gunner sight[optic])
Just like what we had with MBT where we had stabilized main cannon but still can fire HMG that are not-stabilized on the roof .

1 Like

indeed, this would be a great idea, even better if they made the optics elevate 85⁰ upwards with the launchers

1 Like

they finally saw it and closed it, saying it exists internally and they also said nothing specific is said in the documents, bruh

Their weapons are stabilized by linked to stabilized sights. It’s not the same case.

There is currently no direct evidence that ADATS 25mm is stabilized. I previously wrote a report using the same source and it was rejected.