This sway reduction is rly nice tbh increased burn time also makes medium-long range shot more probable imo but maybe its cuz of this sway fix
1 Like
Well I wouldn’t consider it “long” range. The stingers are a 5km range missile and are short range. It more short to medium range engagements which still after this update is better.
here it is tracking gbu39s which i locked at 2-3km
so yeah, they did it intentionally so that irst wouldn’t be able to track russian missiles
5 Likes
managed to track and intercept the aasm 250 hammer (could never against kh38s and 29s) but can’t upload the vid because it’s 30bits bigger than the cap of 4mb
1 Like
Sry i meant long range for adats
Bruh even a damn gbu39 😑
1 Like
I guess not, as Oerlikon spokeperson presentation is not enough.
3 Likes
bruh, what would even classify as a primary source in that situation
3 Likes
yeah, but i guess Gaijin won’t address it
Bruh i remember gayjin changing rafale flight performance based just on a fkn video. Good job gayjin keep it up
6 Likes
I have no idea, afterall a document made by oerlikon spokesman
That goes in depth about the ADATS
Is for sure secondary
6 Likes
Hi @Smin1080p_WT
Sorry to bother you, but could you plese tell me (us here) why was a document like that classified as secondary?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aBxC4qoPeTge
yeah it is a secondary, now tough to find a primary source
Hello
This is a lecture paper:
“Lectures at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich
in the winter semester of 1984/1985
Head:
Federal Office for Communications Troops
Divisional General J. Biedermann, Chief of Weapons of the Communications Troops”
Primary sources are manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc. Not crew statements or lectures written by employees.
I guess i should share the whole document.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240711230409/https://www.hamfu.ch/_upload/Elektrooptik_in_Flablenkwaffen.pdf
You can clearly see its classification as a lecture is incorrect from the people who archived it.
It is a Manufacturer presentation to people higher up. You do not go and share detailed information about a system that is still very much in the works (1985 is a year where the ADATS was still in the testing)
7 Likes
Sadly this is not a primary source. Lectures / staff speeches / quotes / presentations are not considered primary sources.
Primary sources are manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc
1 Like
Devs constantly moving the goal posts on what acceptable meanwhile adding stabiliser to naval ships thet never had them for gameplay purposes… Meanwhile cas at top tier is running riot and when presented with the best evidence to date… Naaa mate just a lecture bro.
17 Likes
i’ll wait and see if Lockheed or Rheinmetall responds to my inquiry about it
update: Rheinmetall answered, just have to plan a conference with the Dr.
1 Like
still doesn’t count even if Mr. Somaini was very much involved in the ADATS project?