Accurate BRs?

Increasing the max BR so more br ranges are introduced and allow vehicles to be more spread out to make less effective vehicles more viable.

Historical match making as a side mode would be interesting

1 Like

That’s a valid idea I agree with you there.
I’ve thought about the same thing too, would be an interesting concept to have.

1 Like

For example, the british F-4 Phantom, the one at 11.7, it faces F/A-18s, F-16s, Flankers and J-8s, that should stay the same BR but the planes that it faces should be increased in BR

1 Like

Really?

Want to get your 75 sherman and fight my tiger?

Never specified which sherman, could be talking about the 105, 76 or maybe, yes the 75

1 Like

76 would be fighting something within its br.

Are we going to fight on a flat map from Miles away like a realistic engagement or we gonna get close enough to see each other’s driver?

Doesnt matter to me.

Newsflash 76, 88, and 90mm were all around 42-45 so it’s not inaccurate at all for some of the tanks but a Sherman would probably fought Panzer IVs before running into a Tiger

End of the day it was just a hypothetical question for game that claim’s to have realism

And? Sherman 76 was like 1944. Would of beem able to see tigers.

Yes, realistic vehicles. Realism does not mean historical.

Also, not sure why you want to back away from something that isnt an issue for you

They tried events with historical mm and they sucked. People tend to choose the nation with the better tanks so you end up with lile 95% of players trying to be on that side.

Everyone wants historical brs until they are the 75 sherman fighting tigers

My F-14 would appreciate that

2 Likes

No sorry your fighting MiG-31 foxbats and your gonna like it

If you do some research a lot of the more common engagements weren’t with Tiger’s, mainly Panzer IVs and Tank Destroyers plus the 8.8s.
Sure Michael Wittman engaged Shermans and such in a Tiger but it was an ambush role not showing up in the middle of a town like “Hey Americans right here yanks”

Realism doesn’t mean historical? What are we playing World of Tanks now? (No hate love that game and my IS-7)

I am going to like it. Those are free Phoenix kills. The Aim-54 was literally designed to counter MiG-25/31s.

If you want to go that route, a lot was lost due to infantry and break downs. Should have those.

Yes.
Realistic and historical are not the same word. This isnt a historical larp sim game

Clearly the f14 should be lower br than the mig21bis because new always means betters.

1 Like

In that case tank shells fragmenting once they hit the inside of a tank is unrealistic as well might as well be playing a different game

Yes, there issues with that because proper simulation would lag the game.

It has gotten better with time.

F-15As trained against Sea Harrier FRS1s and were quite thoroughly beaten. So I guess F-15As should be 10.7 not 13.0