Remove MG’s on sepv2, give it APS and fix the turret ring. Done.
We can start with the players who are playing them. You experience in the Abrams is dependent on how your team performs. You cannot change the tide of the game by yourself, teamwork is key to win. However this is not the case for US. Top tier US sucks because majority of the players are low level clickbait players with no lineup.
Yeah sure, the turret ring needs improvements and there were bug reports made regarding the “internal spall liners” which was acknowledged by devs however it’s still not going to improve the overall experience playing the Abrams if you have inexperienced teammates.
Also I’ve noticed that you literally have no top tier vehicles so why speak on issues you have no experience in? This just seems like you want to make a rage bait post which is working
Great test to see how many people who like brigading US posts there are since it seems like everyone I expected is here.
I would like to start my analysis on the M1 abrams, by saying that although i have a 10:143 K/D ratio, and me being level 34, I believe that i have played it enough to form an opinion on it, that being said onto the analysis.
The M1 has a long history in war thunder, and at times it has been very strong, but currently, it’s very weak, example being the M1A2 SEPV2, it is useless as it stands right now. a simple way to fix this is adding a DU hull, spall liners, which aren’t kevlar armor, reducing the engine sounds, and possibly nerfing its opponents, like the T-90M, which is much better than the abrams, and the Obj. 292 and 2S38, all are far too strong for the abrams to compete with, 2 of those being premiums
now, onto the proof. https://youtu.be/qXmyEmQrllY?si=zUwaLstxO-U-vg1W if you watch this video with the audio off, you don’t hear the engines, this is a representation of what it should be like in warthunder.
For the spall liners claim, the proof is >insert classified document
and also, >insert image of M1 that I pretend has spall liners
I believe if these changes are brought to the game then the M1 will actually be playable. thank you for reading.
/s
Best example of US mains I’ve seen so far.
absolute garbage, dont even call these abominations in this game Abrams.
Keep going, I hear they give out good bingo prizes
“nothing wrong” it has a massive 360 degree weakspot that is completely Unrealistic.
I will flat-out say it, I’m a US main
you forgot one
Still a smaller weakspot than exists on the challenger 2 or ariette
now find me where i typed the Abrams was the worst top tier? I’ll be waiting.
Oh wait… here a Bingo X for you to make up
" random person on W.T forums talking about a tier they don’t even have a tank in "
Or " Random person that hasn’t even hit lvl 50 yet "
" Random Person that doesn’t even have a SINGLE GROUND VEHICLE IN RB "
Lucky you the bingo doesn’t mention anything about only arguing using someone’s else profile stats to measure skill.
- Low KD;
- Complaining about the vehicle being “garbage”; Abrams - #21 by sartt
- Kevlar = Spall liners; Russian MBTs: Firepower and Protection versus NATO counterparts - #113 by sartt
- Not mentioning it has good firepower; (No sources claims, from what I could look into, T-80 or any other eastern and asian carousel autoloaders is faster than 6.5s or 7.1s) Russian MBTs: Firepower and Protection versus NATO counterparts - #84 by sartt
- M1 Abrams has DU armor; Frontal Armor of M1 Abrams Series - #85 by sartt
- “M1A2 SepV2 is useless”; What are the most useless modifications on some vehicles? - #33 by sartt
With that I may have bingo’d my card.
The jokes write themselves don’t they
What’s even crazier is I wasn’t even talking about the Abrams, only the bingo card.
In fact, I do not consider the M1A2 to be a weak tank. Maybe you should explore the strengths of this tank and have fun playing with it…
Just do BR, its easy, Pantsir and Leo2s all need to go up.
The chinese VT4 might, in the manual leaked (thai) it said 6.7, but after all, not a big deal unless you Leopards.
This is what mine looks like