And im going to assume you’re gonna use protection analysis due to lacking concrete video proof?
Not surprised tho.
Hmm T90A is top tier tank, Guess that makes T90M,T80-BVM and T72B3 Uber tanks.
Also T72B3 offers better side protection while having much better gun handling, you dont even know what you’re talking about.
Discussion was about Autoloader models that if they have hidden modifiers or not.
Check the topic before posting answer.
NATO:
DM11 - 3.9kg of HE in an HE-F projectile
Slsgr M/95 - 3.54kg of HE in an HE projectile
M339 - 3.66kg of HE in an HE-F projectile
M908 - 1.99kg of HE in a SAP penetrator + HEAT warhead
M830A1 - 2.36kg of HE in a directional HEAT warhead
WP:
3OF19 - 3.15kg of HE in an HE projectile
3OF26 - 5.24kg of HE in an HE projectile
DTB-125 - 5.46kg of HE in an HE projectile
DTB12-125 - 5.3kg of HE in an HE-VT projectile
Relatively equal, granted the obvious increase in caliber which has its own drawback of abhorrent reload rate.
It makes them… Also top tier tanks.
It really isn’t a hard concept mate.
No side protection increase is seen in the T-72B3/['89/'90] package. It’s quite literally as armored as the T-90A, if not less due to weaker composite.
Gun handling is irrelevant to survivability. Do not derail the topic.
T90A isnt top tier tank mate, learn the difference.
Looks like someone has no idea about UBH modification, how surprising…
Fine, let’s go with the route that the T-90A isn’t a top tier tank and completely forget the proof showing a high-explosive round overpressuring it.
What bullshit excuse will you pull for these?
There’s even DM11 going straight through 4S23…
The UBH modification (2016 armor package slapped on a 2011 vehicle with missing features) is, once again, irrelevant.
Can you show me what difference the T-72B3 UBH modification makes to the turret roof?
It’s not like I stated twice that I was mentioning the base 2011 variant, though…
Show me an video evidence where you consistently overpressure T90M,T80BVM and T72B3 through Commander sight,cupola or roof mg, but wait you guys can only show me protection analysis results which everyone knows how inconsistent it is.
So stop pulling bullshit excuse from your empty pocket and give me something good.
UBH modification increases side protection against KE and CE ammunition but somehow it is irrevelant?
Dude what kind of stuff you’re smoking?
I couldnt care less about what you mentioned, in game 72B3 does offer better side protection due to UBH modification, stop coping.
Its also quite funny how you changed shooting angles on those cupola shots in order to make sure rounds can overpressure in protection analysis, shows how desperate you are.
You’ve been shown photo evidence where such was done. What difference is there?
If you really insist though… I’ll do it when I’m home.
Can you explain to me in detail how it is inconsistent?
You’ve been the only one grasping at straws to disprove the myriad of screenshots of this exact scenario.
Are you blind, stupid, dense, or a mixture of all 3?
You seemingly can’t read, nor show me any change the UBH modification makes to the turret roof to make the T-72B3 more resistant to HE than the T-90A.
I’ll just take it that you’re wrong…
Who is “you”?
HE penetration is the same regardless of what angle it contacts at.
Again, more short straws. Keep grasping.
He’s not wrong. The 2a6 is on par if not better than every other MBT (Excluding the up armored leopards)
And you’ve judged it on what basis (that it’s better, including the Abroomz, since that poster mainly plays only them), exactly?
You’ve only got German & Russian MBTs (well, and the AIM, in which you’re performing worse than in the 2PL, an AFV that is objectively inferior to the AIM…).
And my photo evidence shows the otherwise, whats your bullshit excuse for that?
Playing dumb i see, sadly i dont have time to teach you basic things, learn by yourself.
I proved the opposite with my photo evidence, cope harder.
Personal insults i see, seems like your intelligence become insufficent so you decided to use brute force, how original.
Yup ıt is confirmed that you cant read nor understand, thanks for proving once again.
Its is you, ı guess you also forgot what English is.
Is that the reason why in my screenshots it didnt overpressure both T90M and T80BVM, you’re getting more and more desperate, i love it.
Do you not notice the WR lmfao. Also I’m playing without premium, I had to grind the kekw shot which was tier 3 (what a joke), and also exclusively used it in top tier. Had no issue facing anything that wasn’t a leopard with it. Do I have to play the challenger and arietes to know they are trash? The chinese tanks are very similar to the russian ones. So that only leaves the merkavas and the type10/90 out I guess.
Cmon Jecka lets be honest here, Leo2A6 is better than M1A2 series overall.
Only advantage I’ve noticed over the leopard is the reload. And the allegedly better spalling dart top tier abrams get
Despite having better reload i feel much more comfortable in my Leo2A6 due to having better Turret/Hull protection,much less exposed turret ring/not having exposed pumps in hull, Spall Liners, better Shell penetration/Muzzle Velocity and better commander thermals.
Only M1A2 SEP is equal to Leo2A6 in my eyes due to having better Gunner Thermals/Reload, similiar mobility, oh and MP HEAT.
WR is a team effort, lol. Look at your K/D instead (1.46 in the 2PL versus 0.94 in the AIM)
I had to grind the kekw shot which was tier 3 (what a joke), and also exclusively used it in top tier.
So have I? I’ve also the AIM, and had to play it with HEAT-FS.
Do I have to play the challenger and arietes to know they are trash?
Ever thought about why I name dropped the SEPs specifically? But hey, there’s at least a few that are better (because they fit the meta better).
Bro what, SEPv1 is outright superior to the 2A6 (better thermals on top of having somewhat effective side-protection, yes, I use TUSK on my SEPv1 and I’m loving it), M1A2 on the other hand is roughly equal to it. M829A2 simply spalls so much more consistently whereas the difference between A2 and DM53 in terms of penetration is irrelevant, and not to mention the 1s faster reload has saved me so many times y’all undervalue that way too much.
Despite having better reload i feel much more comfortable in my Leo2A6 due to having better Turret/Hull protection
Cool, but that’s like, subjective.
Versus M829A2. Their armor profiles are near identical.
Despite having better Gunner Thermals/Reload its equal to Leo2a6.
Leo2A6 has:
-better Turret/Hull protection
-much less exposed turret ring/not having exposed pumps in hull
-Spall Liners on Turret
-better Shell penetration/Muzzle Velocity
And if you equip TUSK1 kit you basically become less mobile than Leo2A6, SEPV1 advantages becomes Reload time and Gunner Thermal Sight only in that case.
I’d say Leo2A6 is still superior overall.
To me both shells spalls almost the same so i dont fell any difference, however bein able to target larger weakspot and sniping enemy tanks through longer distances is more important.
Its niche positive side, i prefer fixed Abrams over 5second reload tbh.
I believe i clearly stated that it was my personal opinion.
It is a 4mm plate of structural steel, plates this thin doesnt generate secondaty shatters in game.
For reference the 5mm that protects the armor on the challengers
Bro’s Screenshots are more bright than most countries future.
