Most shells have pathetic amount of HE (less HE = less pressure)
Weaker tank roof (half of the turret has 20mm) (less armor = easier to overpressure)
USSR
One of the best HE shells
2 small areas of 30mm in the turret.
And that’s why it’s many times easier to kill some abrams with pressure on some t80 than vice versa. No hidden modifiers or secrets here. It’s just the way mechanics work.
No side protection increase is seen in the T-72B3/['89/'90] package. It’s quite literally as armored as the T-90A, if not less due to weaker composite.
Gun handling is irrelevant to survivability. Do not derail the topic.
Fine, let’s go with the route that the T-90A isn’t a top tier tank and completely forget the proof showing a high-explosive round overpressuring it.
What bullshit excuse will you pull for these?
There’s even DM11 going straight through 4S23…
The UBH modification (2016 armor package slapped on a 2011 vehicle with missing features) is, once again, irrelevant.
Can you show me what difference the T-72B3 UBH modification makes to the turret roof?
It’s not like I stated twice that I was mentioning the base 2011 variant, though…
Show me an video evidence where you consistently overpressure T90M,T80BVM and T72B3 through Commander sight,cupola or roof mg, but wait you guys can only show me protection analysis results which everyone knows how inconsistent it is.
So stop pulling bullshit excuse from your empty pocket and give me something good.
UBH modification increases side protection against KE and CE ammunition but somehow it is irrevelant?
Dude what kind of stuff you’re smoking?
I couldnt care less about what you mentioned, in game 72B3 does offer better side protection due to UBH modification, stop coping.
Its also quite funny how you changed shooting angles on those cupola shots in order to make sure rounds can overpressure in protection analysis, shows how desperate you are.