Okay yea, needs to be fixed then. Also like not sure how gaijin thinks ammunition gets into the turret with a big wall?
4 Likes
Maybe gaijin thought Chinese tankers could do magic. Able to teleport the driver’s side of the shell from one side of the wall to the other side of the wall. XD
10 Likes
Currently, the armor on the VT5 in the game is completely incorrect.
6 Likes
true
3 Likes
Is it official that you want to build such an unattractive vehicle?
6 Likes
agree
2 Likes
gaijin should pay more attention to vt5
3 Likes
In this article, we can see on the next page that the designer said that the upper armor can resist 100mm after adding ERA
7 Likes
VT5 should fix protection and get rid of that damn turret gondola
4 Likes
Yes, the current VT5 has many issues with its internal structure and armor. Hopefully, the developers can see this. They modeled the VT5 after the ZTQ15, but in reality, there are significant differences between the two.
8 Likes
I hope the developer takes it seriously
3 Likes
How is it possible that the armor protection of a 33-ton tank is inferior to that of a 20-ton infantry fighting vehicle (IFV)? Did your development team even put any real effort into making the game? Or do you just approach this with some kind of bias or prejudice?
10 Likes
Guys, it’s great that you’re so passionate about our game and the vehicles we want to introduce, but insulting other players, developers or even entire nations/races will never be tolerated here.
Please focus on the vehicle, if you have information that can help us make it more realistic and closer to reality, please share it in a bug report on our CBR site . Please remember not to use any confidential documents - it will not help us to develop the vehicle (we cannot use such data) and will cause you a lot of trouble.
Allow us to work on documents, we all love war machines on the same level as you :)
8 Likes
I don’t think most people want the situation to get out of control, but I also hope that the ISUES administrator can persuade players with more appropriate reasons
25 Likes
However, the issue is that at the CBR site, our suggestions are always dismissed by the management, even when they are obvious. That’s why we are voicing our opinions here. How can we ensure that our voices reach the developers?
40 Likes
how are we supposed to fix things if you guys only accept unclassified info directly from the builders/country for a vehicle which has barely been in service for 10 years?, I understand not just accepting any info but I hope you see the point of view from all the players that play the Chinese tech tree, the only thing we can use are videos from fans or the official tv channels which then are rejected?, I just don’t understand, with all the respect I think we all can agree something will eventually have to change
21 Likes
This is topic about VT5 tank, not on CBR. Please focus on discussing vehicles here.
If you have question regarding your bug report, please send PM to Technical Moderator, they are here to give you more details on that.
And no one has anything against you voicing your opinion. As long as you are not breaking the rules (sadly some players ignore that part).
This forum was crated to discuss, we have it to discuss with you and read your opinion, ideas and feedback.
And now lets please return to topic discussing how you think VT5 should look in our game :)
2 Likes
sounds good, hope the issues with the vt-5 (gun reload, armor, modules) are resolved in the soon future, and thanks for your work and dedication, have a great day=)
7 Likes
This is a Chinese-made tank designed for foreign trade, and most of its information is publicly available. All the materials provided in this post come from non-classified sources, including publicly available video files and speeches. The primary purpose of these materials is to promote this tank, so most of the information in this post is accurate, reliable, and non-confidential.
Therefore, I believe your development team has no reason to reject such authentic data, especially when the tank you created has obvious errors and unreasonable nerfs. Compared to the real VT5, the VT5 in your game is clearly too fragile in terms of defense, features an unrealistic turret bustle, lacks reliable armor on the upper front hull and turret, cannot withstand machine gun fire on the sides, and has an inaccurately oversized autoloader structure.
19 Likes