so true. VT4 was the most ridiculous one and now comes the VT5. Even for the simplest thing, make separated ERA model for VT4, they refused because they think grouped ERA is a 'mechanics‘ that helps ‘simplify game algorithms’, but ignore the facts that VT4 only has 25 groups of ERA, but T90M has about 86 groups :(
Yea, Gaijin always up only russian tech.
They never care any Chinese tech. They think Chinese composite armor worse than bulletproof glass made in Russia. Even Russia glass can defend 12.7mm ammo but not Chinese armor.
My suggestion is to use the adjacent head as a reference. The average head height of Chinese adult males is approximately 231mm, which you can use as a scale reference for measurement. If you’d like, you could also search for this host’s height and use their height as a proportional reference for measurement. I’ve personally attempted similar measurements and obtained comparable results.
Negative, how about j10a? It was nerfed because of INTERVIEWS from CCTV.
Very strong evidence, support
J-10 was not changed due to interviews, ever.
Facts don’t change.
Facts do not change based on your words.
This is VT5 topic, please stict to it and discuss different vehicles in their own threads.
Thanks a bunch for all your hard work and sticking with the VT5 topic! Hope you have an awesome day! 😊
Yeah, right. To show my faith in your noble words, i cant wait to see the changes of VT5 with the all facts from this post and check whether facts change or not. Of course i know i have no right to judge what is the fact and what is not, someone does have.
vt5 has 33t but now i think about 20t compressed air on the armor,the side‘s only17mm,not even as private car,obvious that‘s wrong
Thank you for your support and attention, which has been very helpful in our discussion of vt-5
Very obvious.
TAM-2C, CV90105, and TAM-2IP are all in the same weight range.
Only 2IP has extra armor and it adds 3 tons, similar addition of weight to the extra armor VT5 could get to bring it up to 36 tons.
CV90105 is less armored, and TAM-2C also less armored with the exception of the hull front plate where it’s 32mm thick.
Good meme picture,This is what happened to us.
I think this is clear enough, I used the hight of VT-5(2500MM) as standard, which should be more accurate than head size. So we get a 105mm UPF armor, which could be composite or solid steel armor, and 40+45=85mm LPF, which should be solid steel.
Thank you for your dedicated efforts to the community and the game.
The issues with the VT4A1 have left many Chinese tech tree players deeply frustrated. Furthermore, the VT5—another made-for-export Chinese tank—appears to be facing a similar situation. This has inevitably raised concerns within the community about potential unintentional bias against the Chinese tech tree.
Chinese tech tree players widely hold pessimistic attitudes toward newly introduced Chinese vehicles in War Thunder. Many Chinese players, disheartened by these recurring problems, are even hesitant to try the Chinese tech tree. It is deeply regrettable to witness such sentiments overshadowing the potential of these vehicles.
I apologize if this digressed slightly from the main topic. Thank you once again for your hard work, and I hope you have a wonderful day.
I have an issue regarding the frontal armor of the VT5. I mentioned these points and have conducted measurements.https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZChOEo488xOR