What low tier plane can they use to learn about notching, flaring, using radar and BVR?
1 Like
air isnt the main issue with new players they can learn that stuff pretty quickly the main issue is ground, though an answer would be the a-10a
Ahh yeeees, the plane that does not have BVR capabilities and does not have radar would be great for new players to learn about BVR and radar.
You are just wasting our time here with your poor trolling attempts
notching, cant say much about bvr since I stick to IR cause of xbox having limited controls you can use
Please lets get back on topic, no more spam.
take it to PM if needed :)
1 Like
Do you not play the game for the sake of enjoying the game? The game itself and enjoying the game is why I want CAS. It’s a means to an end.
To me War Thunder is that game time playing the actual game.I wish I didn’t have to grind or mod anything.
CAS is fine in my opinion, at least as long as it’s not overused, but yea overall I enjoy the game using stuff I like to use (as long as idiots don’t interrupt and ruin everything for everyone)
1 Like
If you do not pay anything then you don’t pay. If you do pay you do : ) , I am at the point where I accept both co exist together and or should be appreciated by one another.
1 Like
well said (just a picture I got from looking up scholar, idk if that’s spelled right)
1 Like
well I play the game mainly becasue i have a gaming addiction. But when i finished the TT i noticed that the goal is the grind, not top tier. Top tier is just a fake goal you think you want to achive but if you remove the fake goal which requires the actual goal (grinding) then you dont have a reason to play. Thats why single player games with only a story mode loose players after a month or two becasue they achived the fake goal and had a good time doing the actual goal. Thats why some games have a unreachable or variable goal like a new “high score” to make the game replayable. The game isnt a Simulator in the traditional sense like IL-2:Sturmovik or DCS where the actual goal is to actually play the game for the sake of playing the game, here we have a goal, which is to grind. So you can get to this state of “enjoying the game” which mostly isnt even possible since a lot of the gmae is unbalanced so you wnat to get something better which you have to grind for.
2 Likes
You are correct, there is no such thing as purely fair play in any game, some people are going to naturally be better than others.
But my argument with him wasnt about the game being purely fair.
Its just a shortened figure of speech meaning a player using a method of play that all players dont like being used against themselves, but partake in themselves.
Everyone has spawn camped at one time or another, even me, but I dont pretend nor advocate it as fair/clean play.
What was especially worrying was at the start of the conversation with my reply to the game master over his hypocrisy of saying spawn camping was a legit tactic, while also saying that J’ing out to deny someone a kill wasnt. And he brung up the Fair play part of the game.
How is it fair play to spawn in and die before being able to leave the spawn and play the game? Its not. Just like its not fair play to deny someone the points for killing you when they worked for it.
But both are able to be done in game, so us players are all doing it.
What got me so aggravated with the guy who responded to my reply to the game master (which if you noticed the game master himself never replied back to me after pointing out the hypocrisy in his statement) was that he continually attempted to “rebrand” spawn camping as something else.
And I admit, I got aggravated and my quality dropped and I apologize.
But you can call a BLT a Cheeseburger all day long if you want, but it doesnt make it so.
Also it doesnt matter if 1,000,000 people are doing the same thing, if what they are doing is wrong (or in this case “dirty” play) It doesnt make it right or “fair” play.
Spawn camping exists In almost all pvp games to some extent, but just like the JIng out or TKing in AB Gaijin could do something to mitigate it better than what they have done currently.
And you cant honestly say that Gaijin cant see the issue in their data with as much spawn camping is going on especially up in the higher tiers, just like the TKing issue on take off in AB.
The problem with looking at “data” and solely going off of that to make changes to a game (or anything in life really) is that inevitably some data is getting left out. Whether due to a oversight, or on purpose, not all the data is being accounted for and the results are skewed.
For example the devs and game masters love to tote on the win/loss ratio of vehicles as a metric of how good a vehicle is and whether or not the vehicle needs a buff, but there is other data there besides that.
Successful penetrations vs just hits of specific shells can show if a vehicle is struggling with its current ammo.
Active participation time in a match can show if the vehicle is just dying constantly, or an actual benefit to its team.
Those are just a couple examples, but neither of those examples would necessarily show up in a win/loss ratio if the vehicle is being carried to victory by the rest of the players line up.
Back to the not listening thing though.
Gaijin is literally spoon fed ideas by their community, ideas that they can clearly see how much support it has, and ideas they dont have to pay anyone for.
But Gaijin continuously ignores things that have tons of support and would obviously make the game better, just to turn around and do something off the wall that leaves us gamers wondering what the hell and questioning their sanity.
Vehicles are balanced by their earnings which is directly linked to actions like killing someone or capping the point in GRB.
Some few maybe. If Gaijin actually looks that deep which most of the time they dont.
Are you guys discussing this on the right post and subject heading?
1 Like
I just answered his response.
But the guy with reading issue showed up so Ill leave
Its showing up on the wrong thread, just wondered if it was a fault that’s all as you posted a link a little while ago : )
I just had to correct your wrong statement so others don’t get mislead.
I posted the link you asked me to at the time.
Real K’s response was here which is why I replied to it here.
No that’s fine ,no worries but the conversation you are having, presumably on a separate thread is showing on my thread.No big deal, just odd and I don’t want you getting into trouble with the moderators unfairly : )
I didn’t think posting a link did this.