Well, air launched - looks like all, except of Aim-7
Even a Phoenix C from 80’s
1 Like
pheonix A had it aswell from what i remember
Yak-141 R77 when gaijching?
1 Like
Sidenote, i think its funny how when someone says the Abrams armor isnt modeled right, people say “its because the US isn’t good at building tanks, they have a doctrine focused on air” then when an air-air missile is performing well, “Theres no way the AIM-120 could be this good”
A didnt, theres MK60
C is, MK47 booster
Different manufacturers
That thing has 60 countermeasures. Do you really wanna fight in 13.7 lobbies with that?
yes
ah, my bad, guess i misremembered
fair enough
1 Like
Btw, 120 in game way younger than others fox-3(except of phoenix btw)
not the AAM-4
Paper plane must not get anything.
man i just want pl12 to be buffed
1 Like
wait no, this just isnt true at all lmao
Theres no information at all, similar to most cjinese planes/etc
It is
Amraam IOC 1991
Others - at least 1999
So it’s older, not younger.
1 Like
Considering the Game does not use Reallife issues, alot of Stuff ingame would be broken (in a not op way) if they were modelled accurately. It wouldn’t matter if it’s Air or Ground Vehicles. Warthunder basically just represents how a “what if” ××××-vehicle would actually perform.
Yak-141 would drop from the sky after 60s of VTOL, Russian T-34’ engines would overheat in Snow Maps, Panthers would break their Engine & Transmission, R27 would have a hit-rate of 20% and much more
(take it with a grain of salt please)
Ah, yes, wanted to write some different thing, your right
Yeah, that means the AIM-120 is OLDER
1 Like