AAM-4 missile nerf

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
34

Nah

35

Soooo thats an amraam, not a different missile lmao

36

Bro what did u take 😭🙏

37

are you trolling now? do you know what export names are?

4 Likes
38

It is, must have reduced smoke engine, way better by kinetics and seeker

39

That’s why I wrote it’s the same as “-” 😭🙏

40

all arhs are underperforming compared to irl, aam4 and pl12 are the worst offenders

1 Like
41

😭🙏how you can say that!😭🙏!!!

1 Like
42

Yes, thats fact.

43

The amraam ain’t under but over performing bro

44

compared to irl it is underperforming
XD

1 Like
45

I’ll just grab some popcorn while reading this heated discussion LMFAO

6 Likes
46

You brought the same missile into the conversation again… its the same missile. I mean literally an AIM-120 but in swedish naming structure. “The AIM-120, the MICA-EM, and the AIM-120 are better missiles than the AAM-4” is essentially what you said.

47

Kinda want to check his statcard and monthlys to make it more interesting lol

2 Likes
48

aim120 and rb99 are the same missile bro 😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏😭🙏

7 Likes
49

In your opinion? Maybe.
Theres already a lot of bugreports, that amraam must be better by kinetics and seeker, also reduced smoke

50

most modern american missiles and jets use reduced smoke motors/engines

1 Like
51

Well, air launched - looks like all, except of Aim-7
Even a Phoenix C from 80’s

1 Like
52

pheonix A had it aswell from what i remember

53

Yak-141 R77 when gaijching?

1 Like