Amraam is underperforming. Live with that.
Can you prove they werent as good as the game depicts them? Seems like EVERY person who says this is just like βno shot they were this good, i dont believe itβ and thats their only evidence
The rb99 itβs LITERALLY the same as an amraam
Nah
Soooo thats an amraam, not a different missile lmao
Bro what did u take ππ
are you trolling now? do you know what export names are?
4 Likes
It is, must have reduced smoke engine, way better by kinetics and seeker
Thatβs why I wrote itβs the same as β-β ππ
all arhs are underperforming compared to irl, aam4 and pl12 are the worst offenders
1 Like
ππhow you can say that!ππ!!!
1 Like
Yes, thats fact.
The amraam ainβt under but over performing bro
compared to irl it is underperforming
XD
1 Like
Iβll just grab some popcorn while reading this heated discussion LMFAO
6 Likes
You brought the same missile into the conversation againβ¦ its the same missile. I mean literally an AIM-120 but in swedish naming structure. βThe AIM-120, the MICA-EM, and the AIM-120 are better missiles than the AAM-4β is essentially what you said.
Kinda want to check his statcard and monthlys to make it more interesting lol
2 Likes
aim120 and rb99 are the same missile bro ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
7 Likes
In your opinion? Maybe.
Theres already a lot of bugreports, that amraam must be better by kinetics and seeker, also reduced smoke
most modern american missiles and jets use reduced smoke motors/engines
1 Like