This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
7 Likes
Yeah I would sit here for half an hour just writing Abt a missile in an unbalanced game
It’s nowhere close the best missile bro, it has 32gs, it’s one of the worst now.
Now, delete all the text, at least before you learn basic stuff.
You just doing same, aa put trashbin on the table and discuss about it.
1 Like
Why it must not have it in single plan?
No shit that it’s generated 😭🙏
2 Likes
He even didnt know basics of missiles
2 Likes
Why should i sit here for half a fucking hour writing ts?
1 Like
Why even live then bud?)
Let the AI do it for you
1 Like
Probably meant single plane maneuverability, or maneuverability with half of all control surfaces aligned. AMRAAM does 35G single plane, AAM-4 might be a bit more complicated.
It is not more complicated
AAM-4 already uses a roll input for the functionality of the directional warhead and it is most likely also used in normal flight to roll the missile into dual plane maneuverability, where all control surfaces are aligned increasing turn performance by ~1.4×. Normal missiles can reach that too, but don’t actively roll to achieve it, giving missiles with roll input an edge.
AAM-4 doesn’t use roll for the warhead, and likely doesn’t have any roll control
However, Gaijin doesn’t model any dual plane maneuverability, only single plane.
So AAM-4 would be more agile than AMRAAM through this, achieving constant 44.8G maneuvers, rather than 35-49G depending on the aspect.
AAM-4 has a fixed limit of 25G, meaning no matter what it can aerodynamically pull, the missile FCS is limited to 25G turns to preserve energy
However this is assuming 32G is correct in single plane, which is likely not the case with AAM-4 being described as ~5% more agile than AIM-120B, or 36.75G single plane, 51.45G dual plane.
Again, 25G is the correct value.
The 32G, same as the current inaccurate motor, likely come from Gaijins current idea of the AIM-120C, as they did not accept sources on the AAM-4 itself and probably lack information beyond the common 120C-5 and AAM-4 comparison.
7 Likes
it’s literally the 3rd best ARH after mica and aim120 XD
It’s literally not
1 Like
it has the exact same stats as mica just without thrust vectoring
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
6 Likes
Not anymore, they gave it it’s own Flightmodel now. (Still true that it USED to have 1:1 MICA stats without TV)
Therefore can be banned according to EULA
(Mods pls)
oh fr? still 3rd best after mica nad aim120 im guessing
No
Youre wrong
Mica em have sustainer
Aam-4 doesnt
Theres nothing similar, except of seeker(btw same for all fox-3 except phoenix and 120C-5
Zino is saying “how would making the AAM-4 the best missile in the game, improve game balance?”