If you needed another demonstration of the aim-4d being an all aspect missile, just compare it’s firing envelope diagram (C) with the firing envelope of the AAM-1/AIM-9-B (B) …
It’s interesting that the table shows the AAM-2 missile as being much longer (2700 mm) and heavier (90kg) than said in other sources (2200 mm and 74 kg, respectively).
Considering that the missile displayed in the gifu air base and in the various period pictures looks smaller, matching the other sources, i would guess that this table is a very early engineering calculation of how far they could stretch the aim-4d frame with a bigger rocket motor (that goes from single thrust to boost sustain) and a bigger proxy fused warhead before they started reducing the required size and weight by replacing vaccum tubes with in house solid state electronics, smaller battery size, smaller coolant reservoir (assuming they were keeping extra cooling fluid in the missile pylons instead) and so on.
I also find it interesting that according to their own calculations the proxy fuse actually slightly reduces the kill probability in a pure rear tail chase (from 90 to 80%), but it also shows it’s worth by more than doubling the kill probability in a front quarter attack (from 30 to 60%). I wonder if they were already aware of the premature detonation flaw of the period proxy fuses against afterburning targets back then, the french only discovered that problem in the wake of the iran iraq war and the angola border war…