Ew lol
Can you explain why f2 is too modern but EF isn’t? Isn’t the EF we’re getting, much newer? I think I read someone saying this is the block 15 EF. Which came around 2010. And the f2 is from 2000.
Eveything I read online says the EF beats it in just about every category. So how in the world is it not in the chock for near future release? This makes no sense to me.
I’m not source of knowledge on this stuff but my Google-fu tells me we already have more advanced fighters in game(soon to be anyways). So I can’t see why it wouldn’t be added.
Genuine question here.
Doesn’t Malaysia have some bad ass flankers? Maybe it’s them or Indonesia I can’t remember. Wouldn’t mind seeing that in the Japan tree lol.
They had plenty of support for the Nazis, and provided immense logistic and material support to the Germans. Not to mention a bit of manpower.
They were “neutral.”
Me when I lie
3 Likes
wasnt there talks about new game modes as well this update?
we got all these copy paste stuff cutting about and top tiers just a crush fest over in meer minutes. for arb
what is going on man
Characteristics described in blogs are always subject to change:
Then what of the A-7E RTAF?
That thing also gets 9Gs and AGM62s even though all it ever carried was 9J/9P4 and possibly Mavs ( even that’s debatable).
Y’all throw historical accuracy out the window or something? Capability doesn’t mean used operationally or am I going insane (not like it would be impossible to balance if fixed anyway, why did the devs not bother?)
5 Likes
lets be honest mate, its not been historically accurate for some time,
look at the mk5 chieftain, no LRF, and no L15A5 round, which was teh standard APDS used at that time. not L15A3,
FGR2 and FG1 are missing aim9Ls as they were deemed at the time of the report sufficient with Gs
i mean look at the CR2 they completely opened up a weak point in the turret just to fix the issue with teh model of the harp floating.
We need a full QoL update or more, of just bug fixes, and patches for vehicles to use their actual weapon systems
1 Like
Fully agree. Man, they have zero clue what would happen to player numbers if they went and made a decompresso and QoL patch.
The hole keeps being dug however, let’s see how deep it can become )))))
2 Likes
i mean the EF 2000 at 14.0 is absolutely insane it should of been 14.3 minimum
I know right.
Update “groundbeaking” all over again lolololol
( Joke in there somewhere)
1 Like
hahahahaha, all joking aside but we need serious decompression, new game modes, and the bug reports for all the issues over the years responded to
1 Like
See the fun thing about the bug reports thing is that they should abolish the whole “intended for balancing” thing.
Hell they got TWO BR systems for air and still go about the balancing like it’s one and universal thing.
That and cleaning up the bug reports site, that place is a circus, not speaking about the devs here as well lol.
1 Like
Man the bug report system is bonkers but as well, theres absolutely tons of em just left to die, again look at the CR2 man it had a roadmap change thing for it and they absolutely done nothing (made it worse recently) and just abandoned it to its fate.
even the CR3 has been moved due to being worse than the CR2 BN and 2E.
the m1a2 abrams sits at 11.7 for god knows what reason eveen though its superior to every other 11.7, leopard 2a5 is 12.0 yet the M1A2 sits at 11.7?
but then again its functionally identical to the M1A1 Click-Bait and if they moved the A2 they need to move the CB.
so here we are. they just balance how they want and do not care about the other aspects.
1 Like
Muh statistics.
Insert Italian CL-13 being played by top 10 air players only meme
4 Likes
mate genuinely look at the british tree, the hunter F6 sits at 9.7
same as the Hunter F58 , which has better missiles, same guns, better engine, RWR, and counter measures.
the F6 for benelux which is arguably better due to the lower BR with better engine and what not for whatever reason.
i mean even the gripen isnt balanced with itself xD the Rdarter carring gripens are far worse than teh aim120 carriers
1 Like
Why does this only start with the F84?
Why not have Bearcats and Fireflies and Helldivers , Curtis Hawk, Martin B-10??
Japan doesn’t need WWII additions, they have plenty of domestic aircraft currently in WT, and there are more that could be added.
1 Like
When has “doesn’t need” been an actual consideration? And these are mostly post WW2…
They fight in WW2 brackets.
I already hate seeing bf109s when flying U.S/Britain vs Germany/Italy on allied side. I also hate seeing F4Us when flying japan against U.S britain.
We don’t need to ruin visual IFF modes even more.
1 Like