Unless something changed, the R2Y2s aren’t being removed this update, but I suspect they will be removed fairly soon.
I also hope the V1 stays since it’s the most realistic iirc.
Well considering what a dev said, it was a tad later on. But I’m more concern with what.
Hopefully. It was the closest to be possibly conceived and all of the documentation shows us what the design would have looked like. Unsure about the guns but considering Japan was struggling I wouldn’t be surprised if they started to work with 30mm’s seeing their 20’s not being effective enough against bombers of the time.
Naval is a whole different story, some nations simply can’t have new contents to fill the gaps without using the unfinished ships, the Italians for example has three unfinished ships (that I could remember), with the newest being Francesco Caracciolo. Without it, the only battleships that Italy could get are the Roma class
There are few ships which are pretty close to dreadnoughts though, like Regina Elena, Regina Margherita, Pisa and San Giorgio classes. I hope we will get them some day.
Also so far Italian projects don’t perform that good from my experience, Etna is absolutely out of meta, Comandante is a subpar destroyer. Would be much better if modellers spent their time on something more fitting to the game, like postwar Italian destroyers. Haven’t touched Caracciolo yet, but from what I’ve heard it isn’t something good, because of only SAP shells. Still Caracciolo is probably the only project in the Italian TT which was worth to add.
Which is funny enough even more controversial.
with the flak gotten because America mains wont be top dog for an update it would cause hell, just a more manageable hell
1 Like
Could they add a tech tree for slavic nations without too much controversy?
…and so down goes fast TT path to the top tier.
All thats left is buying top tier premium.
I find the complaints of copypaste mostly unwarranted considering that the bulk of Thailand’s Air Force are vehicles already in the game. I do want stuff like the Alpha Jet Phase 2, but this is still a nice addition.
If anyone disagrees, feel free to reply
1 Like
Overall, my main complaints are with the direct copy and paste planes, like the F-84G, F-5A, and the first Alpha jet. None of those offer anything new, unlike the Alpha Jet TH or F-5T. As for the top tier additions, I don’t have an opinion on them. I don’t have anything against the aircraft, and with mixed MM at top tier it doesn’t matter a ton.
I personally dislike the F-84G, Av-8, and F-5A, and I’m not too happy about there being even more aircraft that I wish I never had to face.
1 Like
Ew lol
Can you explain why f2 is too modern but EF isn’t? Isn’t the EF we’re getting, much newer? I think I read someone saying this is the block 15 EF. Which came around 2010. And the f2 is from 2000.
Eveything I read online says the EF beats it in just about every category. So how in the world is it not in the chock for near future release? This makes no sense to me.
I’m not source of knowledge on this stuff but my Google-fu tells me we already have more advanced fighters in game(soon to be anyways). So I can’t see why it wouldn’t be added.
Genuine question here.
Doesn’t Malaysia have some bad ass flankers? Maybe it’s them or Indonesia I can’t remember. Wouldn’t mind seeing that in the Japan tree lol.
They had plenty of support for the Nazis, and provided immense logistic and material support to the Germans. Not to mention a bit of manpower.
They were “neutral.”
Me when I lie
3 Likes
wasnt there talks about new game modes as well this update?
we got all these copy paste stuff cutting about and top tiers just a crush fest over in meer minutes. for arb
what is going on man
Characteristics described in blogs are always subject to change:
Then what of the A-7E RTAF?
That thing also gets 9Gs and AGM62s even though all it ever carried was 9J/9P4 and possibly Mavs ( even that’s debatable).
Y’all throw historical accuracy out the window or something? Capability doesn’t mean used operationally or am I going insane (not like it would be impossible to balance if fixed anyway, why did the devs not bother?)
4 Likes
lets be honest mate, its not been historically accurate for some time,
look at the mk5 chieftain, no LRF, and no L15A5 round, which was teh standard APDS used at that time. not L15A3,
FGR2 and FG1 are missing aim9Ls as they were deemed at the time of the report sufficient with Gs
i mean look at the CR2 they completely opened up a weak point in the turret just to fix the issue with teh model of the harp floating.
We need a full QoL update or more, of just bug fixes, and patches for vehicles to use their actual weapon systems
1 Like
Fully agree. Man, they have zero clue what would happen to player numbers if they went and made a decompresso and QoL patch.
The hole keeps being dug however, let’s see how deep it can become )))))
2 Likes