i mean the EF 2000 at 14.0 is absolutely insane it should of been 14.3 minimum
I know right.
Update “groundbeaking” all over again lolololol
( Joke in there somewhere)
1 Like
hahahahaha, all joking aside but we need serious decompression, new game modes, and the bug reports for all the issues over the years responded to
1 Like
See the fun thing about the bug reports thing is that they should abolish the whole “intended for balancing” thing.
Hell they got TWO BR systems for air and still go about the balancing like it’s one and universal thing.
That and cleaning up the bug reports site, that place is a circus, not speaking about the devs here as well lol.
1 Like
Man the bug report system is bonkers but as well, theres absolutely tons of em just left to die, again look at the CR2 man it had a roadmap change thing for it and they absolutely done nothing (made it worse recently) and just abandoned it to its fate.
even the CR3 has been moved due to being worse than the CR2 BN and 2E.
the m1a2 abrams sits at 11.7 for god knows what reason eveen though its superior to every other 11.7, leopard 2a5 is 12.0 yet the M1A2 sits at 11.7?
but then again its functionally identical to the M1A1 Click-Bait and if they moved the A2 they need to move the CB.
so here we are. they just balance how they want and do not care about the other aspects.
1 Like
Muh statistics.
Insert Italian CL-13 being played by top 10 air players only meme
3 Likes
mate genuinely look at the british tree, the hunter F6 sits at 9.7
same as the Hunter F58 , which has better missiles, same guns, better engine, RWR, and counter measures.
the F6 for benelux which is arguably better due to the lower BR with better engine and what not for whatever reason.
i mean even the gripen isnt balanced with itself xD the Rdarter carring gripens are far worse than teh aim120 carriers
1 Like
Why does this only start with the F84?
Why not have Bearcats and Fireflies and Helldivers , Curtis Hawk, Martin B-10??
Japan doesn’t need WWII additions, they have plenty of domestic aircraft currently in WT, and there are more that could be added.
1 Like
When has “doesn’t need” been an actual consideration? And these are mostly post WW2…
They fight in WW2 brackets.
I already hate seeing bf109s when flying U.S/Britain vs Germany/Italy on allied side. I also hate seeing F4Us when flying japan against U.S britain.
We don’t need to ruin visual IFF modes even more.
1 Like
They fly at WWII BRs.
There should be a priority of domestic additions over other additions. Japan just does not need any of those planes, and they shouldn’t be added.
1 Like
The m1a2 is worse than the SEP, the SEP is 12.0.
The SEP is much worse the. 2a7.
The m1a2 should be 11.3 if the sep is 11.7 because it’s not even close to the 2a7 or Strv’s which are 12.0.
It’s a decompression issue, but if anything it should go down because in no realm is any tank besides maybe, MAYBE a t90m(because of armor) close to a 2a7. They are their own class of tank and if 12.0 is the highest everything but them should be below 12.0.
I would rather say go up, cause if we raise top tier to 12.7 it works much better. ABRAMS could stay 12.0, whilst most other things go up except for the one and only ariete which of course neeeeeeeed to go down. Also works better if we had 13.7 CAS.
100% with you. Tanks should be like 13.0 right now and jets should be 14-15, IMO.
It would decompress top tier ground a good deal.
1 Like
You can apply the same logic to the german leopards before 2a7…
1 Like
The m1a2 is a fantastic tank to be honest even with it half spaded my kd is pretty good compared to my other top tiers.
The abrams is better than most yhe competitors it is not an 11.3 tank at all, why on gods when it was 11.7 for how many years did it not move to 12.0
The m1a2 sep is not worse than the A2 either, the sepv2 and sep v1 are functionally identical bar the v2 not having tbe option to remove TUSK.
Non of these mbts should go down.
And if they actually fixed tbings like the leclercs, merkavas, chinese mbts, and cr2s then they wouldn’t be on such a massive back foot.
“Better than most of the competitors” is an opinion, not objective fact. It’s mid tier, IMO and puts it better than about half and worse than about half.
Your other tanks are all just about 1:1 or less, no matter the nation. You have 8 games in an m1a2, hardly enough experience to make a real judgement.
Seems to me you’re coming from being a British main, literally every tank is gonna seem like a godsend to you, and even then, you’re doing the same in them as you did an Abrams, of any variety.
The m1a2 is inferior to the SEP in every way. Literally EVERY way. In no way shape or form is it a 12.0 tank. A SEP is no equal or close to a 2a7. A 2a7 is a 12.0 tank, every other thank besides another 2a7 isn’t a 12.0 tank. At best, at BEST you could make an argument for a t90 because of armor and spall liners. However it has absolute catastrophic downsides that the 2a7 doesn’t suffer with a side pen. But also doesn’t have era that eats whole darts on side pen too. Which is why I think there could be a stretch of an argument for a t90m, but that’s it. 2a7’s are in a league of their own.
That being the case in my opinion, means every other one is 11.7 or less.
Did you think it was a gotcha moment or something? That would be correct, they could be. Which is why decompression needs to happen.
This is total bollocks ive got most trees at 11.0 or higher bar the isreali and italian tree.
You, sound like a US main who want
Better than
Merkavas
Arietes
Challanger 2s
Ztzs
T90M and on par with the BVM
The 2a5 is worse than the m1a2 as well.
So yeah it is better than most the tanks in game at its br.
It is functionally identical to the M1A1 HC. Ive plenty experience with worse abrams seeing as I used them before they got the m829A2 round. Also in 8 bloody games I’ve got the tank half way spaded 8 games over 18 kills with it before its even spaded.
Between the M1A1, IPM1 and M1A1 HC i have 398 games. Add the A2 which plays the same as them into the list i have 406 games in tbe abrams, that does not include the 313 games learning with the M1 abrams as well.
So yeah i know where i stand with the abrams.
The 2a7 being better than literally every tank bar the swedish variants does not warrant the abrams going down the M1A2 is better than all cr2s, better than the arrietes, and merkavas that all sit at 12.0 and the leo2a5, arguably the 6 as well due to the 6 and 5 having horrendous hull armour.
So why is it 11.7 while all of these are 12.0?
He said the M1A2 should be 11.3 thats the end of it mate.
Edit: checking his stats as well, you are just a US main whos dabbled in other trees 😂 your kds in the damn abrams prove they arent bad tanks.
The Average US team is what makes them feel bad to use.