@Conraire Take a look at this: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA953510.pdf
If Conraire is using the document I believe he’s using, it lists the T15 and T54 firing the T44 at 3875 fps and the T50 at 3300 fps.
T44 would still be 3750ft/s, it appears T44E2 uses a different propellant, as it seems to reflect that in the form factors document as well.
Interesting. That tan document shows T44 and T44E2 at 3875 fps.
Actually it doesn’t show a velocity for regular T44 from the T15 guns. It also has a different propelling charge mass on that document.
carzy how HVAP/APCR is still terrible
2 Likes
Crazy indeed. Borderline insane, even.
3 Likes
Genuinley dont understand why gaijin made the shell penetration so bad and shatter so violently overcommon in such ammo, conveniently not allowing other shells prone to shattering to have the same mechanic
Remember, they don’t play their own game so they don’t even understand clearly how badly they’ve ruined alot of stuff in the game, though they’ve also made it pretty clear they don’t care either way.
Must be nice.
2 Likes
because the devs dont have any knowledge on how things works
they just “work” on the game
they dont research anything
3 Likes
when the fix ?
Because if it did work, conqueror would be fun.
2 Likes
Never. Changing bullet damage would fix a lot of the game’s issues and make it possible to rebalance most tanks in a more historical manner, but it would be a job for the developers that doesn’t generate any financial benefit. An update with 20 new vehicles, 8 of which are premium, is always better than fixing the game’s real issues without generating any financial benefit.
2 Likes
I just hope the fix the stabiliser inaccuracy so that it can be a 7.3
And still pen nothing. 😿
1 Like