A-7E Much Needed Updates

I have been playing attackers lately trying to spade them and I have recently come across the A7E. I have to say right of the bat that this aircraft is in a sorry state compared to other US and other nations attackers at the current BR (Both Air RB at 10.3 and Ground RB at 10.7).

I see a few options for the A-7E to bring it up to the bar of other aircraft at its BR.

1: The Aim 9H should replace the Aim 9D for the starter missile and the Aim-9G should be replaced with the Aim9L. We know it used the Aim 9 Ds, Gs, Hs, Ls, and even Ms towards the end of its service life. I don’t believe it should receive the Aim 9M since that would require a major BR jump in my opinion.

2: The AGM-65F should be added as a ground attack weapon for the A-7E. I think a maximum of 4 AGM-65Fs is fair since it has a much better seeker than the AGM-65Bs. The A-10A Early is sitting at a BR of 10.3 in both Air RB and Ground RB fir example. The A-10A Early has the capacity for 6 AGM-65Bs plus 2 GBU-8s plus dumb weapons and two Aim-9Ls. I think its fair to give the the A-7E a better AGM in a limited capacity.

3: The BR should remain the same with a potential to be lowered to 10.3 all around if the performance doesn’t improve.

4: We should get an additional aircraft added to the game under the A-7E we have in game, the “A-7E Late”. This aircraft should be 11.3 with the AN/ALR-67 RWR (The same that is in the A-6E SWIP we have in game), the Aim-9M, and the AGM-88A HARM. I believe this aircraft should sit at 11.3.

AGM-65F Test image.

Aim-9L being mounted.

1 Like

I swear there wsa another thread that was exactly like this

Not worth

maybe but i checked before i posted and there hasn’t been one in about a year that i saw. I also don’t like when someone says that a vehicle we have with updated weapons is “Not Worth” like what about it? It seems like an easy vehicle for Gaijin to make to add some variety to the vehicles we see used.

a image of the A-7E laucnhing with 2x AGM-65Fs outside of testing
image

1 Like