Operation barbarossa was for the most part a stunning success, heavily outnumbered german forces smashed the soviets and pushed all the way to moscow. it’s a poor example of an unmitigated failure. Elon musk is also the second wealthiest man on the planet. do you not know what the word fail means or something?
AverageWehraboo explaining how you’re trash if your Jumbo sherman with mid armor (oh wowzers it can withstand short 88!) and a shit gun dies to a Nashorn camping a corridor with a long 88 that complately negates the extra armor:
If you get ambushed you die. Where’s the problem? You outperform the Nashorn in every way except the gun.
Because every Nashorn player knows this and camps in places where you can’t see, and then you die because it has a long 88 at 5.3.
Are you suggesting the Nahorn is op at 5.3?
KV-122 has entered the chat: it’s not about the length, it’s the girth bros
2 Likes
The reloads are what they should be.
Why dont we give a light vehicle more armour?
Why not give biplanes missiles?
1 Like
P-26A with Tiny Tim rockets ^^
lol.
1 Like
A long 88? kinda!
Armor is not a balancing stat. Reload rate is.
2 Likes
it’s all silly.
1 Like
I mostly agree execpt with the IS4M and IS 6
You say that it happens to every tank. You have not proved that.
I brought it up to demonstrate that a bunch of mechanics have bugs, and are not reliable most of the times. You have not disproved that, by providing a single example. Yes, you disproved that it only happens to 2 piece/bulk modelled ammo, that is true. You however did not disprove that ammo explosions are not a reliable mechanic, and, over the years, there have been a single example of this happening to a vehicle that is not in the criteria i have described, which further proves how trash the damage model/coding is.
True. But go back to why i brought it up. That still stands. To disprove it, you will have to show that it happens to every single tank, even those with single piece individually modelled ones. If not, at least prove, that it happens regularly to those (except of course the blowout panel tanks).
It was an objective failure. Learn history.
No. he is not. Most of his wealth is in highly inflated Tesla stock, that will sooner or later crash.
If he is so damn wealthy, why did he have to get a loan from the Saudi Arabia?
He is a serial liar, a fraud, and an idiot.
After all, i bet you have your house covered in solar rooftops (a false advertising), while you have your full self driving Tesla (coming next year since 2014 or so) in a Hyperloop (of which most startups already went bankrupt. A trash idea Musk stole from a 100 or so year old fantasy), operating your own fleet of fully autonomous robotaxis (since 2020 appearently) generating $30k every year for you, while you can watch the live feed from the Mars colony (when Starship can’t even launch without blowing up, something NASA could do 60 years ago flawlessly) with your brain implant (which started as a completly different thing by people that are competent at least in one thing, unlike Musk).
Also don’t forget the whole Twitter thing…
Did i leave out any of his lies/false promises/overhypes?
EDIT:
Yeah, i left out Starlink, which is also a complete BS if you think about it more than 2 seconds.
Oh and how could i forget the Boring Company, that promised fast tunnel boring that pays itself by selling bricks made from the materials dug out. Which ended up being a not so true, while the tunnel was dug slower than an average tunnel, despite it being smaller than the average.
What about the high speed self driving pods? That was ended up by manually driving Teslas at 50 km/h, and also creating a nice deathtraps if one or two Teslas decide to just blow up (which they like to do).
END EDIT.
Maybe learn to think critically before believeing anything to that failure (he was also fired from PayPal because he wrote so trash code, and he was a bad leader too).
A few things to consider:
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/@commonsenseskeptic/videos
https://www.youtube.com/@Thunderf00t/videos
Because reload rates can be changed. And many of them are also not realistic. Just watch any video about a Leo 1 reloading, and it is much faster than in game. Same goes for a Leo 2, Abrams, etc.
Reload rate can be used for balancing a tank.
What I just quoted is what I said about it. You just lied.
Beyond that claim I made (that individually modelled ammunition can not explode when blacked out, and that your statement is untrue), I have to prove nothing else, and to prove my claim, I have to show literally just 1 example. It is your claim that individually modelled ammuntion always explodes, as such, you have the burden of proof to show that is the case, keeping in mind I provided proof showing that it is not the case.
I don’t. You never provided proof of it being true in the first place. You stated it as being true but that is nothing.
You don’t have ground to stand on to demand something like that.
Going great guys! Make more noise and arguements, keep this thread up top, so this gets attension then I can eventually have more fun with my Bias Heavies when their reloades are buffed.
Why? those 2 need it the most. The 122mm is the worst 7.7 gun.
Move the Sturer Emil to 10.0 as well because it has a big gun
Where?
And you disproved it. Congrats.
Now, could you address what i originally brought that thing up? Or are you just going to be dishonest and claim that i lie?
LOL.
What 7.7 heavies actually need isn’t an artificial reload buff.
They need removal of the option for their barrels to be damaged by the guy they’re aiming at. Are HEAT(FS), AP(FS)DS, HESH, derp HE, and CAS not enough options to deal with something you cannot pen frontally? Especially when maps favor speed and fast reloads that most 7.7 heavies lack? Do you really need to be able to frontally cripple every single potential opponent with every potential tank you could use?
If I stick my barrel around a corner and someone sends a shell through it, that’s my fault. But there is no way I am able to engage something and not present my barrel tip as a target to the guy I am aiming at, unless he is dumb enough to shoot first.