Do you have any actual evidence, or you just say something that fits your narrative?
His YT channel would disagree:
Don’t take these videos too serious he comes up with a new best or worst tank every other week.
The IS-6 is better in angle pen, post pen, side armor and is slightly faster. Everything else that matters is worse than on the T32E1 yet one “isn’t too bad” and the other one is “the saddest heavy tank”. At the time of the IS-6 video it was still 7.3 so that would explain why he only had downtiers in the IS-6 and mostly uptiers in the T32. Of course the IS-6 does better in a 7.7 game than the T32 does in a 8.7 game.
In the very video you listed to support your argument you can even see him eat a 600mm pen atgm to the face with it doing 0 damage.
No offense but you do realize this thread is mainly for Realistic Battles? It seems like you’re arguing from an Arcade standpoint because you never played any 7.7 RB match.
And it still has broken front armor that is 70mm to pen, 7.7 heavy with Panzer IV armor levels… I reported this in 2018 so surely any day now.
I remember shooting an R3 with thing and it yellowed a single crew member and then it just killed me from the side because it has useless armor everywhere else.
Forcing the T32E1 to play as a medium when the M47 and M48 are significantly better mediums isn’t a justification for keeping it at 7.7.
The T32 trades side armor for mobility. The IS3 and IS4M are much tougher to kill from the sides. They get their various APHE rounds and the massively OP APHEBC slope modifiers.
You USA mains are all the same you only play 1 nation a lot and never consider any other nation.
Forcing the T32E1 to play as a medium when the M47 and M48 are significantly better mediums isn’t a justification for keeping it at 7.7.
You can’t read. The T32E1 CAN play like a medium in uptiers while the IS-3, IS-4M and Maus CAN’T play like mediums and are completely useless in uptiers. That doesn’t mean the T32E1 should play like a medium all the time. It can (like the other 7.7s) sometimes play like a heavy in downtiers.
The T32 trades side armor for mobility.
The IS-3 and IS-4M while having less acceleration are actually faster but they get much worse reloads, worse shells if you consider volumetric, less than half the turret traverse, worse gun handling overall, worse velocity on their shells and the biggest downside is the -3° gun depression instead of -10°.
OP APHEBC slope modifiers
These shells get caught on the most random object because of their diameter but russian bias amiright.
The IS3 and IS4M are much tougher to kill from the sides.
Flakpanzer 341 full penned my conquerers turret face with his AP round yesterday, and exploded and killed all my crew. 49mm of pen against the literal strongest part of the conquerers turret btw.
Also yesterday, sent my 120mm APDS round straight through the chest of a DF105s gunner (+some spall) and didnt even turn him yellow lol. Zero damage whatsoever done with that round through the center front of his tank.
You can aim properly all you like with APDS, its so unreliable that you cant help but laugh at the absurdity, plus the shell shatter mechanic being incredibly unpredictable.
At least the russian 122s immediately delete whatever they penetrate.
YES! YES! Finally! Another person that can’t support his claims with evidence starts this nonsense…
So please tell me, is there any difference in ammo detonation, effective armor, shell shatter, etc between AB/RB?
Also, you say this, while you having an obvious botting record, which is against TOS btw…
And? It is still much worse than alloy APDS, or even solidshot/HEAT. The only thing that is worse than carbide APDS is APRC.
And when i point out the trash damage of carbide APDS, i am not talking about shots like this, but shots, where a direct hit makes a module/crew member orange.
Yeah and? It could have been caught up in the barrel, or hit the endge of the mantlet.
And yet, every one of those heavy tanks at the same/similar BR yielded him a better result, than the Conqueror, and he didn’t just leave the match because of suffering, which he did in the Conq video.
You mean it not exploding, or blacking out?
And i agree with that. I was just pointing out that the guys were talking about realism there.
LOL.
Why don’t we test it out ourselves?
It was pixelhuntuing with the Breda, but do you know why? BECAUSE THE BREDA CAN’T LOLPEN IT UNLIKE EVERY OTHER SHELL AROUND 7.7 WITH OVERPRESSURE CAPABILITIES.
What? So the Conq magically has a shorter reload than 90mm guns? In which universe?
Even if we talk about only the soviet 122mm guns, even if the Conq shoots you first, you are likely going to survive, so you can just get back to cover, and reload :)
You also get your gunner back faster than he reloads.
Is it always in hulldown?
I did, that’s why i know…
False, again.
And neither was i talking about those.
Easier to use for bad players. Give the other tanks and a Jumbo to a good player and he will perform well with all of them.
That was just a trash shot. Aim better next time. There are 2 barn sized parts on both sided of the turret you could have shot, yet you shot into the barrel. Congrats!
Flakpanzer 341 full penned my conquerers turret face with his AP round yesterday, and exploded and killed all my crew. 49mm of pen against the literal strongest part of the conquerers turret btw.
So? Autocannons ignoring armor is nothing new and I’ve died to it too. That’s doesn’t only happen to the Conqueror it’s a known issue.
Also yesterday, sent my 120mm APDS round straight through the chest of a DF105s gunner (+some spall) and didnt even turn him yellow lol. Zero damage whatsoever done with that round through the center front of his tank.
You can aim properly all you like with APDS, its so unreliable that you cant help but laugh at the absurdity, plus the shell shatter mechanic being incredibly unpredictable.
Random damage happens to any APDS, APCR and even APHE
APCR hits the gun directly and doesn’t even turn it yellow.
