Any F4 in game if access to AGM65 carry 6 of them but in german have 2 and can not carry GBU
WHY???
because thats how it is irl
4 Likes
How do you know?
No one of german plane can not carry 6 or 4 TV guided unlike any nation in the game
because its been talked about and proven before, germany didnt use these things
4 Likes
They don’t have the triple racks.
4 Likes
Luftwaffe did not bought LAU-88
4 Likes
I don’t know
But suffer me when i want attack with AGM65 with this and hunter just 2
I am sad😥😟😓
yeah blame Bundeswehr are dumb enough to realize germany player need some good CAS in warthunder, Ive been doing so and it is effective lmao
but be serious, they cant carry 6 of them is because they didnt buy the triple racks to carry more than 2 AGM65
1 Like
thats switzerland, yet anyother country
1 Like
well Luftwaffe in that case
1 Like
more specific yes
The Luftwaffe unfortunately seems not to have used the 3x rails, but that is no justification for the F-4F with two Mavericks having the same SP costs as any other Phantom that carries 6.
2 Likes
This is why we need itemized sp costs for suspended weapons.
1 Like
because this one lost all AGM-65 capability when it was made
it also lost sparrow capabilities and a ballistic computer
only later was it modified to accept some of these weapons again, and they only ever made it work with 2 AGM-65s
I cast “Yak-141 mention”
1 Like
No, it could work with 6, but the Luftwaffe never purchased the tri-Mav-rail as they had deemed it not needed during the upgrade program. Basically, the F-4F doesn’t have six Mavs solely because of them never having the tri-rail.
We’ve had this argument for literally years but there has only ever been proof that it can carry 2 Mavs
nobody has yet managed to prove to gaijin that it really was Tri rail compatible
if you so confidently tell me it is capable then please submit that bug report with the proof you have
Right, but you’re quite literally not reading what I’m saying.
nobody has yet managed to prove to gaijin that it really was Tri rail compatible
Ohh gee, almost as if they never purchased it so proving it is pointless. Like, I’m not even arguing it should get it, I’m just saying it could get if Germany had the tri-rail in their inventory. You’re so far down the rabbithole that you only see what you want to see and what is actually being said.
if you so confidently tell me it is capable then please submit that bug report with the proof you have
Okay, someweirdenial.
purchase doesn’t matter
it for AiM-9E and 9J, those were only ever supplied by the USAF for the US training airwing and that was more than enough proof
if it could actually carry them then why shouldn’t the same jave happened to the mavericks?
show your proof, I dare you, I want those tri rails too
Smin confirmed that F-4Fs have 9Js only for balance years ago… and quite frankly F-4F Late shouldn’t even have 9Js as I’m pretty sure they weren’t compatible with the new rails, could be mistaken but I really don’t care.
show your proof, I dare you, I want those tri rails too
My guy, I’ve been following this discussion for years and literally neither side has any proof what’so’ever. The only real argument here is that Luftwaffe has never had the tri-rail in their inventory nor did they ever carry it in the US while on training. You jumping down my throat because I simply re-iterated that fact only makes you look pathetic. Go back to being in denial of the Swiss F/A-18C honestly because I refuse to continue this discussion any longer.
if it could actually carry them then why shouldn’t the same jave happened to the mavericks?
Idk, ask Gaijin. They have yet to give the UHT its 12xPARS loadout even though it has been shown that it could do that.