Which is exactly the reason for aligning stats and analysis
Which is also what I’m willing to see, yet we don’t have it, so we try to approach it.
So here the number of planes comes into play
Didn’t say non.
Even stats can be judged with sample numbers dates etc. Why not here?
Maybe check what happened to that fixed wing next. By contribution etc.
The number of planes has nothing to do with it as people are using variety of planes not only the ones from the heli B.R…
Has nothing to do with the already low intention of spawning a plane, which is low enough to make SPAA players cry for low rewards, and is low bcs they don’t worth the sp.
Again, another assumption or You have any data to back it up?
Low intention? that’s why impchap KB is there. Killed everyone but without a high KB.
Maybe play impchap to feel the power
So just assumptions, thanks.
What’s the uses of stats if no theory is suggested from it?
Try explain without your definition of assumption:
Same or barely different performance, different stats.
You won’t assume a prem to be played by the few better guys right?
Nor a different enemy composition due to different tech trees?
Can’t believe I have to explain this.
Maybe because prem vehicle is fully researched from the beginning and doesn’t make You grind the vehicle without guided rockets?
Maybe prem vehicle is accessed by more unskilled people? (See us prem stories)
Call all these assumptions and former you are going to discard all these lol
But what I have said is not an assumption but rather the truth.
Premium vehicle has access to the guided rockets from the start, tech-tree variants need to be researched.
Guided rockets that can be used outside of SPAA effective range is better than ungided weaponary, again the truth.
People have been doing bad with easily bought prems, proven by clickbaits themselves. We also call it the truth, as long as we believe first spawn helirush is worse than later spawned atgm despite having totally different tactics.
I always like to have commonly believed stuff but nah not former you.
Nah. It meets rolands with 3.5-10 default optics…
It’s not the kind of “better” which is given by pure performance difference on the same type of weaponry.
i.e. Comparison between 1000lbs & bullpups - different, r27r & r27er - same.
Failed conceptual shift xD
It’s a waste of time. You are talking to a brick wall.
Everytime I check this topic it’s the two same guys having a slinging match. Could be a PM chain.
I love see how people rolling into “mud” like this otherwise is boring.
At first, I tought you was talking about their out-rageous anti-tank ability and how APHE allows them to kill frontally virtually every single tank, reading the answer from your deleted post made me realise you meant their anti-air ability…
35mn AA is simply bad at AA, literally just dont stand in one spot, their shots are slow predictable and extremly easy to see
thats BS. You wont hit anythng that have at least slight movement at 3km+, lol.