Of course.
If I’m doing badly in ‘Tiger’ and I’m doing better in ‘IS-1’, Tiger is for sure the better vechicle!
2 Likes
It’s almost like… one of the best IFVs in the game (that people don’t complain about because it’s not Russian) is one of the best IFVs in the game…
If the Lvkv9040C were in the Russian tree, we’d see an “Lvkv9040C to 11.3” thread. And the BILL should be 12.0.
What I find incredible is that these people are so insane that even if they play Russian vehicles and do poorly in them - they’ll still claim they’re OP. I have YET to see a single person with a 2S38 K/D over 2, that’s also claiming it’s overpowered.
3 Likes
The mobility in the practical sense is nearly identical
the gun handling in a practical sense doesnt matter if you’re having to swing your turret around 180° becuase you’re too deaf to hear a guy behind you its on you
the pen is a sidegrade like ive mentioned you trade pen for RPM
the optics are nearly identical its 8x compared to 9.4 and dont even try to make the “muh 3rd gen thermals” 2nd and 2rd gen are identical ingame practically
AA capability is just as good shut up about it
And survivability is better on the cv90 against autocannons
2 Likes
its just the norm if you say russia op russian bias german cry your a good community member
2 Likes
Okay, tell you what. Put the CV9040s at 11.0, and the 2S38 at 11.0 too. I don’t really care if you think the CV9040s are OP, because the 2S38 is undertiered.
I’ll make that sacrifice.
why can’t you just leave them as they are?
What a brave soul. Sacrificing himself.
‘2S38 is OP’
bUt ThE Cv9040!!@!*@(!&#@
You are the one making a claim and having Your own stats contradict that
2 Likes
I don’t own the 2S38, because I’m not pathetic. I don’t need to pay money to have an edge over people. The only OP thing I’ve ever bought is the KA-50, mainly because I didn’t know it would be OP at the time, and I simply don’t use it because it’s disgusting.
Also the fact that you idiots incessantly go on about the Lvkv9040C is hilarious, when it’s mediocre at best. The actual best Swedish IFV at that BR range is the BILL, you would know that if either of you knew literally anything. But none of you own Sweden, none of you have played all of the IFVs spoken about here, so none of you know jackshit and you are all simply talking out of your ass, having a circle jerk about my stats in a specific vehicle.
Go away.
1 Like
Dude please just stop it
2 Likes
Yeah. This is what shows that there is no point in having a discussion with You.
So OP! 1.65 K/D in it! Get a hold of Yourself.
Just shows that You don’t know what You are talking about.
2 Likes
I have literally every Swedish IFV.
Congrats!
Doesn’t change anything in the discussion.
1 Like
Its not and neither is the cv90 just leave them where they are in br. if you say the 2s38 is OP you have to concede that the same is true for every other 9.X/10.X IFV, the bradley has all the same features bar the HE-VT but gets Tow-2 in return the same goes for the PUMA, BMP3, BMP2M and ZBD04A theyre all fine at their current BR
4 Likes
Both Nano and Sneed have made it clear they want to call others dumb.
You’re defending them.
Get lost.
You unironically think the fucking M3A3 Bradley is equivalent to the 2S38? Are you actually for real? You THINK the 25mm autocannon is the equivalent?
This thread is just full of clowns, I’m out. This is just spiking blood pressure for no reason lmao
1 Like
You already made the point. Let them sit and chew on it, for all I care. Both of them have consistently proven they’re only here to argue for certain lines and complain about how others treat them.
Their last words aren’t worth arguing, except to get the last word in.
1 Like
True. All they focus on is my stats in specific vehicles for some odd reason. It’s not even worth talking to them.
If you’re making obviously dumb statements and points im going to let you know about it get over it the guy whining about the 2s38 is desperately trying to claim its OP while downplaying the CV-90 this is stupid he’s being stupid
1 Like