You don’t seem to understand that something can only be broken relative to other vehicles - and the Lvkv9040C is easily just as good if not better than the 2S38…
The 2s38 performs nearly identically to the cv90 series i literally already explained that in that wall of text earlier but it seems you’re too lazy to read
It does not perform identically. Neither of you even own the 9040 series.
Its a premium many people spent money or time to get it its not gonna go up cause you have problem with it yes its a weird vehicle sometimes biggest round in game cant kill it sometime .50cal remove it
yes it can obliterate lower brs in right hand no it never can perform good in higher tiers give the game time soon every techtree will get something to counter a thing like 2s38
It sure is funny that you have the Lvkv9040C - and manage a K/D over 2 in it.
While in the BMP-2M, a tank most people consider better than the 2S38 (me included), that also has multi-purpose capability: you don’t even manage ONE kill per death…
It’s almost like you’re defending a clearly overpowered vehicle?
Ill make a quick list
They both have reliable mobility
They both have IRST
They both have good APFSDS
They both have autocannons
They both have good HE-VT
They both have high quality thermals for their br
They both have decent survivability (should someone not fire HEAT-FS or HE)
The cv90 series has a higher rpm
The 2s38 has higher pen
The cv90 has spall liners on some variants
The cv90 is immune frontally to 30mm
The 2s38 has better gun handling
The cv90 series has one variant with access to the only good top attack munition
The cv90 series has one variant with a radar
2 Likes
It doesn’t. You trade faster horizontal traverse for much worse gun depression. I would rather have -8 deg of gun depression with the lower height of the Lvkv9040C and 33 deg/s traverse than the 2S38’s oversized hull and -5 deg of gun depression with the 56 deg/s of horizontal traverse.
Its better but not by much im trying to be nice to the mentally deficient ones in the thread
3 Likes
I know. I just don’t want to give them an inch.
Do you know why? Because I use the BMP-2M at the highest BR, and I play extremely aggressively, purposefully misusing it, because I don’t like camping.
At 10.0, I use the CV9040s as they are intended, and I brawl with them, so I obviously do better with them. The BMP-2M is a much better IFV than the CV9040s, just like the 2S38 is. Statistics mean literally nothing, and you are a cope filled balloon for someone who has very unimpressive replays.
1 Like
Of course - the objective number is wrong because you have excuses ready.
And you speak of cope…
2 Likes
Oh yes, of course!
2 Likes
really?
1 Like
I don’t camp. I play for the objective. I play aggressively. It gets me killed sometimes. I use vehicles far beyond their intended BR because I like them. Yet I still consistently do the best out of my team the vast majority of the time.
As of right now I’m playing 8.7 with my friend using 7.0-7.7 British vehicles. Why? Because I’m grinding Britain, and he’s grinding 8.7 Germany, and I don’t mind the uptier in Centurions. You incessantly whining about stats is meaningless to me, the 2S38 is far superior to the CV9040s in mobility, gun handling, pen, optics, anti-air capability, and survivability.
Get over yourself, and stop pretending. Perhaps camp less, or die less to aircraft judging by your last replay.
2 Likes
So you’re the type of player gaijin is catering to by making smaller call of duty maps yeah no wonder youre whining about the 2s38
1 Like
And it just happens that You did that only with BMP-2M and not Lvkv 90C.
2 Likes
Is the implication now that the Lvkv 90c is now magically better than the BMP-2M?
If You state that vechicle ‘x’ is better than vechicle ‘y’, Your own stats should show that You are able to do better in vechicle ‘x’.
2 Likes
Cope overload.
1 Like
Your logic is actually retarded.
Okay then so I guess if we’re basing balance off of my stats and how I decide to use a vehicle, then the BMP-2M is far worse than all of the CV9040s.
1 Like