Only thing it has really going for it is good thermals and good ammo, everything else is pretty garbage. It has no mobility, no gun depression and no armor.
Im talkin about T90A, havent played the bishma.
1 Like
I mean pretty much everybody agrees with you, that it can go up. You are just so stubborn to not listen counterarguments that it shouln’t go to 11.0 but rather to 10.3 or 10.7, you don’t even see people are in gerneal agreeing.
And it doesn’t roflestomp. PUMA back at 8.3, that was roflstomping.
1 Like
??
- 2nd Gen thermals
- 3BM-60
-4°
Acceleration to 35 km/h:
M1: 4:53 seconds
Leo 2A4: 4:48 seconds
T-80B: 5:27 seconds
Chally Mk2: 6:90 seconds
T-90A: 7:87 seconds
It has no armour to anyone with basic weakspot knowledge.
It does, but I fail to see how that’s relevant.
The T-90A/S doesn’t use that engine.
1 Like
By that logic, no tank in history has armour, because they all have some weak spot you can hit.
The point is that it’s more difficult to reliably hit the weak spot on Russian tanks, assuming you’re not trolled by the fairy-powered ERA or Stallinium barrel/breeches.
I see Russia-boos saying the 292 is balanced at 10.0 “because it has no armour”. It has better survivability than most of the Challenger 2s for christ sake.
5 Likes
Better survivability than practically all of 10.0 NATO MBTs, even.
This place is really all about that and people coping.
Theres only few discussions that arent created by mods/devs that arent all that, usually being bug report threads or suggestions.
1 Like
Top-tier tanks generally cannot rely on armour, 74% of my shots are side-shots which completely invalidate frontal armour anyways.
The T-90A also has a higher chance of being one-shot than any other MBT I play in that BR range, this myth of the T-90A having great survivability/armour seems to be propagated by people that:
- A) Don’t play the T-90A themselves and base their opinion solely on facing it.
- B) People who’s stat cards show that they die in virtually every match they play in it, thus invalidating their stance.
- C) People who just think anything Russian is OP.
The great matches I get in my T-90A aren’t when I absord countless hits, instead they’re when I out-position the enemies and never get shot at in the first place.
At that point I might as well be driving a tank that actually has mobility, reload rate and gun handling.
1 Like
WT players have a tendency to stat shame people when their logic stops making any sense which is a really bad thing.
1 Like
You clearly dont understand how broken the T-90S can be as a brawler especially since gaijin is making smaller and smaller maps and how dumb the average player is especially on NA servers you can reliably push in a T series tank and know the enemy will just try to shoot the UFP 70% of the time the dame goes for the challengers
1 Like
I would argue that people shouldn’t be voicing their opinions on vehicles that they have no experience playing.
The fact that multiple people are now telling me the gun depression is -6° makes it clear they don’t have any idea what they are talking about. If they actually played it they’d at least be informed about it on the most basic level.
Colour me surprised to find out you don’t even play the T-90A.
Given that I’m deleting T-90A’s with ease every time I see them, I would beg to differ.
The fact that everything runs circles around a T-90 also doesn’t help.
Oh, and colour me surprised to find yet another person telling me this whilst never having played the T-90.
2 Likes
I wouldn’t say WT players in general, just the some of the ones you find scurrying around in threads like this one.
I just can’t take this seriously, sorry. It’s the complete opposite to what I, and everyone else for that matter, have experienced. No I don’t care whatever your, mine, or micky-mouse’s statistics say about it.
2 Likes
And given your vast experience of ZERO matches in a T-90, you clearly have a great sample size to base that argument on.
1 Like
I mean, this is a 2S38 thread, which you don’t own. If you think you’re only allowed to comment on vehicles you have personally played, why are you here?
I have plenty of experience in high tier ground to know what the T-90 is like to play against.
1 Like
Oh, I’m sorry. I have more self-respect for myself than you do to play so much of the Bias-coded Nation on a regular basis.
Actually no, I’m not sorry. I have more self-respect than you do. That’s fine that you don’t, but that’s your problem - Not mine.
1 Like
I play the T-90S which is literally just a T-90A all thats different is a slightly worse shell you’re an actual tool
2 Likes
Which is precisely why I don’t claim to be knowledgable about the vehicle.
We’re not discussing the 2S38 right now, are we?
Not sure what you’re getting at there.
Are you saying that me playing many different nations is a bad thing?
That I would somehow be more respectable if I only played a single nation and constantly talked nonsense about all other nations’ vehicles?
2 Likes
It’s hilarious, you can name every vehicle of the russian tech tree here and somebody finds reason why it’s op.
Now it’s T90, jesus christ.
Reddit propaganda seems to work.
6 Likes
I mean to be entirely fair, if you ever damn yourself to a world of pain, and play Britain, guess which tank is the easiest to play… because it isn’t the Vickers Mk.7… and it isn’t the Challenger Mk.3…
The Vickers Mk.7 and Challenger Mk.3 are some of the best tanks for their BR. Are you high?
The only thing holding the Challenger Mk.3 back nowadays is the 292 spam, which has mostly died down, because it negates its incredibly good turret for the BR.
2 Likes
Exactly this, i would prefer any of those over the crappy T90. Which is why it’s the only tank in that lineup i don’t even have.
1 Like