Oh yes, of course!
2 Likes
really?
1 Like
I don’t camp. I play for the objective. I play aggressively. It gets me killed sometimes. I use vehicles far beyond their intended BR because I like them. Yet I still consistently do the best out of my team the vast majority of the time.
As of right now I’m playing 8.7 with my friend using 7.0-7.7 British vehicles. Why? Because I’m grinding Britain, and he’s grinding 8.7 Germany, and I don’t mind the uptier in Centurions. You incessantly whining about stats is meaningless to me, the 2S38 is far superior to the CV9040s in mobility, gun handling, pen, optics, anti-air capability, and survivability.
Get over yourself, and stop pretending. Perhaps camp less, or die less to aircraft judging by your last replay.
2 Likes
So you’re the type of player gaijin is catering to by making smaller call of duty maps yeah no wonder youre whining about the 2s38
1 Like
And it just happens that You did that only with BMP-2M and not Lvkv 90C.
2 Likes
Is the implication now that the Lvkv 90c is now magically better than the BMP-2M?
If You state that vechicle ‘x’ is better than vechicle ‘y’, Your own stats should show that You are able to do better in vechicle ‘x’.
2 Likes
Cope overload.
1 Like
Your logic is actually retarded.
Okay then so I guess if we’re basing balance off of my stats and how I decide to use a vehicle, then the BMP-2M is far worse than all of the CV9040s.
1 Like
Of course.
If I’m doing badly in ‘Tiger’ and I’m doing better in ‘IS-1’, Tiger is for sure the better vechicle!
2 Likes
It’s almost like… one of the best IFVs in the game (that people don’t complain about because it’s not Russian) is one of the best IFVs in the game…
If the Lvkv9040C were in the Russian tree, we’d see an “Lvkv9040C to 11.3” thread. And the BILL should be 12.0.
What I find incredible is that these people are so insane that even if they play Russian vehicles and do poorly in them - they’ll still claim they’re OP. I have YET to see a single person with a 2S38 K/D over 2, that’s also claiming it’s overpowered.
3 Likes
The mobility in the practical sense is nearly identical
the gun handling in a practical sense doesnt matter if you’re having to swing your turret around 180° becuase you’re too deaf to hear a guy behind you its on you
the pen is a sidegrade like ive mentioned you trade pen for RPM
the optics are nearly identical its 8x compared to 9.4 and dont even try to make the “muh 3rd gen thermals” 2nd and 2rd gen are identical ingame practically
AA capability is just as good shut up about it
And survivability is better on the cv90 against autocannons
2 Likes
its just the norm if you say russia op russian bias german cry your a good community member
2 Likes
Okay, tell you what. Put the CV9040s at 11.0, and the 2S38 at 11.0 too. I don’t really care if you think the CV9040s are OP, because the 2S38 is undertiered.
I’ll make that sacrifice.
why can’t you just leave them as they are?
What a brave soul. Sacrificing himself.
‘2S38 is OP’
bUt ThE Cv9040!!@!*@(!&#@
You are the one making a claim and having Your own stats contradict that
2 Likes
I don’t own the 2S38, because I’m not pathetic. I don’t need to pay money to have an edge over people. The only OP thing I’ve ever bought is the KA-50, mainly because I didn’t know it would be OP at the time, and I simply don’t use it because it’s disgusting.
Also the fact that you idiots incessantly go on about the Lvkv9040C is hilarious, when it’s mediocre at best. The actual best Swedish IFV at that BR range is the BILL, you would know that if either of you knew literally anything. But none of you own Sweden, none of you have played all of the IFVs spoken about here, so none of you know jackshit and you are all simply talking out of your ass, having a circle jerk about my stats in a specific vehicle.
Go away.
1 Like
Dude please just stop it
2 Likes