2024 was bad, and 2025 is likely to be worse


Early 50s Alvis

Thanks for proving my post correct.

WW2 finished in 1945 bud ,so you are incorrect and try taking your M44 was WW2 theory to a military festival or military modeling competition.They will laugh at you as much as we do on here : )

Nice try though mate ,thanks for coming. Happy New Year.

1 Like

I don’t really have any complaints about 2024 other than the change to the wiki page. I prefer the old page just because of the pros and cons. I guess if they bring that to the new page I would use it more. I tend to look at the old one more vs the new.

I see Alvis and those who feel the urge to correct him already managed to derail another quite promising topic with his petty squabble.

You are probably correct. Priority of the GJ is to bring new vehicles, no matter what, each update. Everything else is secondary.
It is bit understandable, but I fear the day when they run out of the reasonable additions.

@Steelbeast
Sir, we are talking about 2024 and 2025, that is objectively on-topic.
Zero of my posts have deviated from that discussion.

If you want to claim off-topic things, take it to our DMs.

Also for the one on-topic part of your post: 2024 brought the least amount of vehicles in any given year.
2024 saw more mechanics additions than any previous year and was clearly the priority over vehicles.

Does anyone think 2025 will be the year of the true anti-cheat? The cheats ruin the game, and are too obvious during play for anyone with significant hours into the game. Personally I wish the anti cheat didn’t stop them from cheating, rather it banned them permanently. The lack of integrity and honor required to run a cheat to compete warrants that in my opinion. PS: For a long time people have argued that cheats don’t happen. If so, why are they changing to a ‘better’ anti-cheat? My guess is everyone that says they don’t happen is using them.

1 Like

M44 is post war. Like many other vehicles that a tiger would never have faced. It ruins the fun to see anachronistic vehicles.
M41 is anachronistic
M109 is anachronistic
Wiesel and Luchs are anachronistic
And many more. And that is just the german tree.
I remember the good old times when the cared for time periods and top tier was Maus and IS-4. These were the times where the game was most fun for me.

2 Likes

I doubt it. Didnt they say they want to change from easyAnticheat to a better option? Still nothing has changed. Also not only cheaters are a problem, also in naval there are many bot players (names with scrambled lowercase letters, playing the Shimikaze or however it is called)

1 Like

Here come the legion of goons to drone on about “balance”.It all means nothing without immersion and imagination.I never expected a game would try to balance a Modern APC with a Tank from WW2 that never even saw a day of action.That was never what I expected from this game when I saw those epic WW2 tank battles on the adverts.Always Modern tanks on modern maps or WW2 duels with legions of Tigers versus T34 or M1 etc

I went with he flow for a while but its lead me nowhere.

The M109 shattered 6-7BR and the M44 killed 4BR. So what do we do? Move to 1-2 BR until they pee all over that one as well?

Reading the forum to kill a bit of time but I dont feel compelled to play any more,the M44 was the nail in the coffin and to think I was prepared to forgive the M109 and renew premium and push on.I will probably uninstall ,I will go with many saying no one will miss me and then read about all those newbies killing the game with their Pack vehicles.

Enjoy the new breed of player : )

2 Likes