Yeah, I have adressed this in the OP:
Bro, JA 37 DI is worse premium than F / A 18.
Even A 4 early skyhawk has better RWR than late viggen.
JA 37 DI / F21 has worst RWR on that tier. Secondly it has only four AIM 120 A:s. secondly it radar is not very good.
SU 33 gets 8 SAHR- IOG - DL whit better radar and RWR. ( they are on same BR )
That’s you:
That’s average:
You’re underperforming massively. I don’t think you’re qualified to give a relevant opinion, “bro”.
But I will entertain your argument for the sake of argument. Here are JA37 DI and Hornets when sorted by RP per game:
He is literally inbetween them in terms of grind power with better SL per Game and much better K/D which means less frustration and more satisfaction.
3 Likes
So i am not qualified because i have not used my premium viggen for four months ?
I dont use because how bad the RWR is, thats why now i play GRB mid tier or in ARB where there is no missille spam.
I’ve seen enough, move Su-30MKK to 12.0
1 Like
surprised the 15jm is so damn good in terms of k/d.
Would’ve never thought it would perform better than the su-27sm these days
No, your assesment of viggen capability is simply questioned since you performance with vigen is below average.
2 Likes
I dont need good K/D ratio to tell Viggens RWR is worst on that BR, everyone who has used it know how bad it is
BC it is only directional ( 8 directions) also it has whit massive blindspots.
Gaijin plz ad the U 95 electrical warfare / RWR pod, it is already in the files and it would solve viggens RWR problem
True.
However
This entirely hinges on you knowing how to use said plane (or fight agaist it for that matter).
With Vigens average stats being so high, its clear that people who can make premium vigen work outnumber those who cant.
2 Likes
No idea why J11 and su27 go to 13.3, but f-15c/f16c remain on 13.7. J-8F should go to 13.3, the missile quality should be consider.
Already is on the DEV server, not sure it deserves a higher BR than the USA one though, It’s missiles are a little better and it’s slightly lighter, is there any other differences (other than the obvious one) that I don’t know about that would make it better?
Edit: seems it was either reverted or my game was bugged and showing it’s AAB rating in ARB
Couldn’t the F16C go down to 13.3? It already has abysmal stats on statshark and a max of 6 missiles doesn’t help it.
Currently ie. not taking into account the proposed decompression, F-16C is fine, FM hard carries it.
Moreso current 13.7 is peak matchmaker. Now that the SL lootboxes are done I cant wait to get the F-15C MSIP, its gonna be fun.
The F16C does not pull, which is crucial in the Fox3 jousting meta atp., you need to be able to get the nose on target at high speeds, the F16 just doesn’t do that.
The 13.7 F-16C block 50 in the US TT.
Does not pull.
Aight lol.
1 Like
I assume he means at above mach 1
Which I would still disagree with.
At high speeds above mach 1 they definitely compresses worse then other airframes like the Rafale and Eurofighter
1 Like
Nah, just 13.0.
Decompressing 13.0 would impact 12.0, but 12.0 doesn’t have much compression except F-4JUK.
Su-30MKK should be the same BR as Mirage 20005F at minimum.
And the twin-engine’d jets above Su-30MKK should be moved up by an equal amount.
