I assume he means at above mach 1
Which I would still disagree with.
At high speeds above mach 1 they definitely compresses worse then other airframes like the Rafale and Eurofighter
1 Like
Nah, just 13.0.
Decompressing 13.0 would impact 12.0, but 12.0 doesn’t have much compression except F-4JUK.
Su-30MKK should be the same BR as Mirage 20005F at minimum.
And the twin-engine’d jets above Su-30MKK should be moved up by an equal amount.
Devs won’t change the Su30MK2/MKK BR so don’t expect any changes to 12.0-13.0. They’re only decompressing by moving top tier air up
F-15C is probably an oversight on my part. I always considered it to be balanced whereas Su-27SM never dipped below 1.0K/D even despite the Big3main syndrom.
It did get better however with the influx of premium fodder in the form of Hornets and Flankers.
F-16C however could be a step below F-15C but it can’t go down to 13.3 in the current meta and especially during decompression. Look up the ADF’s: they have better stats despite having less CM’s, weaker engine and no HMD.
Once they’ve collect a fair share of their profit, they might.
My bet is after Independence Day sales when they introduce the premium F-15 at 13.7.
Last chance October.
You need to consider player skill. Frankly, I don’t see how a J-11 with R-27ERs can compete with an F-15C carrying eight AIM-120s—as long as the F-15C pilot isn’t an idiot. By the way, what BR are you planning for the JAS39C? 13.3? Only four shitty AIM-120s at 13.7 is way too weak, don’t you think?"
You’re not qualified because you greatly underperform in the plane and use your own skill issue as the reason for why the plane is supposedly balanced.
we just need like a .7 gap between a lot of planes
1 Like
I dont want to be an ass but of course F-16C FM comes off worse when compared to bettter planes that sit at higher BR.
Moreso it was clear from the comment chain that the F-16C in question was the 13.7 one, not pobit.
JAS39C has superb flight performance, HMD, tons of countermeasures and Very good radar that has detailed NCTR compare to other 13.3’s.
As long as F-16C Block-40 Barak IIC and Block-50 stays at 13.7 JAS39C has no business bein at 13.3.
1 Like
While I understand your point, doesn’t mean that it invalidates it’s opinion otherwise I’d have to invalidate yours looking at your stats
I’ll make sure to not argue with you then considering my stats lmao
If this is bad, then what am I
Sure, but at 13.7 the F15C MSIP II is just straight up better. The FM while not that dominant at low speeds, allows the Eagle to excel in BVR.
Ill reserve my opinion on this until i get to play MSIP.
Which, now that the SL lootboxes arent taking all of my SL like divorced wife, should be relatively soon.
It’s not about being bad, (personally I’d consider those stats not to be great…) it’s about invalidating someone’s opinions based on stats
1 Like
Tho you agree this is bad right?
Spoiler
You wouldn’t believe me lol but my password leaked and someone from the United States played on my account for several days before I noticed it.
The’ve played almost 50 games on the stock Golden Eagle with this result:
And screwed up my 11+ K/D on Su-30SM2:
Suprisingly F-16C was easier for them:
That’s 120 games injected into my monthly stats.
You can the sharp decline on the graph:
So you should look up all-time since Statshark does not track my sub 1,0 K/D from 10 years ago.
1 Like
I would quote other people who have made my point for me:
I was not making a stat-measuring contest, I was pointing out that @ktgtde operates from the biased position given his extreme outlying perfomance.
It would be the same claiming that Su-30SM2 is something-something simply because I manged to go over 10 K/D absuing the range and radar.
1 Like