"ZTZ-201" aka "New Chinese MBT"

This is particularly true as China has a wealth of 55 tonne level infrastructure and the present need for combat potentially in tibet both requires lighter tanks. One of the major draw backs of ZTZ99A is that it hits the hard 55t limit so it is difficult for them to add stuff to it, cause they’ll have to take the weight off first likely.

Why would u need three of them? I’d assume they are all for the drive to have a better view.

Spoiler

It’s more likely that these are just the same as the two parts stuffed together on ZTZ99A except separated. I can’t really think why say the gunner/commander need to be seeing the road.

I mean it’s a ZTZ96 replacement as well so gotta be cheap, likely mass produced with loads of interchangeable parts.

The driver’s hatch periscope resembles that on the ZTZ99A, split into two separate sections providing forward and lateral views respectively, while the center gunner’s periscope and right-side commander’s periscope offer only basic forward vision—clearly lacking expanded field-of-view capability. The 360-degree panoramic camera system is not located here.

quoting your own image. It’s symmetrical.
image
And still I would have no idea why the gunner need to see the road.

You can see the same gunner’s periscope on T-14.
image

I do believe only the Merkava Mk.4 Barak is capable of such wonders