The RWS can be slaved to the Comanders AR glasses
6 Likes
Well we dont think that the ZTZ100 is a MBT comparing to M1A2sep//T14 while these tanks still focus on their own armor or guns, the ztz100 has Radars on the turret and the radar can scan 360degrees. So that tank serves more like a information center, providing details of the enemy, calling for artillery fire and supports from the rockets and J16s. From that pov, the 105mm gun is rather a self-defence equipment, you wouldnt count on that to penetrate the latest MBTs, but it is really helpful against the T72/90
1 Like
The Type 100 support tank with air defense requirements has radar, not the Type 100 tank
Yea I have not seen APS during the parade but we did see APS on some vehicles coming to the parade so it’s definitely possible to mount one.
Gaijin should only add the ZTZ100 when there’s AbramsX and T14 Armata. I’m afraid gaijin will neglect the vehicle if added too early because they need to balance it.
1 Like
VLS launcher
and it’s more a fire support vehicle than a IFV, more like 2S38 or Begleitpanzer 57
it’s said it can switch to a IFV version by change the VLS launchers to seats, and also a more IFV turret
Not sure about AbramsX, maybe KF51 is a better option (as an addition)?
KF-51 is more like current top tank like L2A7, but fully Rheinmetall. L2 arc3.0 better, or at least newest version EMBT
You can’t add KF51 to the US tree
That’s cool as heck
AI though. But technologically feasible.
2 Likes
Only issue being there need to be enough head space. Don’t wanna bang your head on the wall.
i have provided an argument however.
No you did not, all you said was
the m1a2t has the significant advantage(ofc in the areas where its deployed).
To put it bluntly it’s nothing but a wishful thinking.
The 680 mm/ 0 degree penetration value comes from the infamous 220 mm/71.12 degree acceptance testing. It should be noted that this does necessarily translate to actual 0 degree penetration, since large degree armor testing is more favorable for apfsds performance (LOS) than a theoretical testing against one thick vertical armor. Nevertheless it should have around 620 mm penetration irl due to its special rod design, but as the game uses a standard formula that only accounts standard projectile length it would not mattered anyway.
which is true
Okay, I’m glad you admit it’s a wishful thinking, have a nice day :P
3 men crew confirmed. The choice of words in the original makes unequivocal reference to 2 distinct individuals.
2 Likes
I always thought that there would be 3 people
