345m/s agm in 11.7 xDD and no cm502 and no new dircm. Pointless and doa
1 Like
Sir, I still don’t understand why you are avoiding the topic of CNIRFNF(such as cm502) so much. Could you express your opinion on the absence of IRFNF in China’s TT?
https://youtube.com/shorts/Y8_zkxFMTBs?si=K5pnHGhTTeHG3vYb
This is perfectly fine but God forbid you give China a missile on par or slightly worse than Spikes already in game
In fact, the CM502 can be made very distinctive without being too supermodel, because this missile only has two types of warheads, semi armor piercing and high explosive, and does not have a dedicated anti tank armor piercing warhead. Perhaps due to the detonation distance, these two warheads will be difficult to kill main battle tanks in the game, but can be used to deal with light armored targets such as AA. That is to say, a projectile with excellent performance but limited applicability after firing. Cooperating with Ty90 will make the Z-10 a helicopter specialized in seizing air superiority. Ty90 is anti fixed wing, CM502 is anti AA and helicopter
Made 2 reports on the ME
One on the extendable Radar mast
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dbpxCTl4SeLT
immediately denied for a bogus reason. The shackleton, RCV and PLSS have this feature.
And one for the AG-300M shown with the Z-10ME-01
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QMD8gRJN8tK3
It’s amazing how many people are replying to this while having no clue what difference IRH vs ARH would make without LOAL.
The RCV and Shackleton have the feature aswell
3 Likes
Well KA52 cant either block spikes / pars.
It is actually quite hilarious, since I can intercept VT1 on Clickbait, but not in KA52 :D
This is a mechanic for tank sights. Not helicopters radars currently. It can be suggested via forum suggestion.
1 Like
Claiming that’s such mechanics doesn’t exis in game is just pure lying tho retractable and extendable masts exist on tanks and the Shakleton has a retractable/extendable radar.
They could be a bit more specific if they want to be taken seriously,
Like for example: There is currently no such mechanics on helicopters in the game.
Thats not correct im afraid and accusations of lying are not going to progress the subject.
The retractable sight on tanks is not a functional radar. Tank mechanics are also separate to helicopter mechanics.
The Shackleton element is the same as other existing aircraft like the MiG-23 that has a folding tailplane element linked to the gear operation. The same can be found on the D.521 that has a folding aerial.
This rotor mounted radar has a periscopic radar that naturally has meaningful purpose beyond just visual folding out. Thus it is an entirely new mechanic and not a mechanic in game. The report answer was correct.
1 Like
Well, thank you for the more detailed answer.
and I’ll be more respectful in my posts.
I would imagine it wouldn’t take much to change, would it not? Do you have any insight on what sort of “extra steps” would need to be taken, or if not, know anybody that could shed some light on that?
The fact Gaijin thought it would be a good idea to introduce the Z-10ME without any F&F missiles is hilarious, the Z-10ME is already near identical to the Z-10 in-game the difference being it having DIRCM and… Oh wait that’s it? Yeah that’s it.
Even as a foldered vehicle I wouldn’t grind it and heck, even as a modification I’d probably go for it last lmao.
I was unsure if CM502 has LOAL, and I have no idea why you think it has LOAL. But to be fair, even though it has LOAL, you think that this 25km F&F with LOAL will break the game more than Kh-38MT? And what is the reason you guys decided to delete Brimstone’s LOAL? How about Spike’s?
One more thing I must point out is that gaijin’s modeling and data are wrong in many cases in China’s top tier, as far as I know. And you guys keep not a bug issues, and I was very sertent that bug manager was not reading at all, then I have reason to suspect that cm502 is nerfed or has a buggy version, even if it is added in the next update, based on what you guys add for the Chinese vehicle that you have been updating over the past few updates.
And after all, if you think that was really panic to add CM502, what is the reason that it is not folded?
And here is the video to show how powerful Kh-38MT with GNSS
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Y8_zkxFMTBs
3 Likes
Could we at the very least get IIR AKD-10s? It’s a modular missile anyway and if the devs don’t want 502KG cuz balance ( the balancing department is a lie anyway) they should at least make the helo somewhat useful.
3 Likes
So the 345m/s agm in toptier its okey in your opinion? I dont think…
Pars and spike er is f&f too
The ingame brimstone variant does not exist in real life.
Ingame ef2k variant does not exist in real life too
Su30sm have sm2 arsenal and sm1 engine and radar so this ingame variont does not exist in real life too
Why not add the cm502 with ir seeker and limit the range to 10km ?
Does not mean anything, since “Report based on guesses will not be accepted”
1 Like