yeah but didnt the devs consider Janes as not a good sources?
also
1 Like
theyve accepted literal guesses from slightly educated wt players id say this is a far better source
1 Like
lmao me when they reject 10 military sources but accept one ms paint drawing and the one only source that state “that is how it is”
1 Like
I would, but USSR 50 cals only have 1 bullet in their belts that can pen them side on… so its very annoying
I can’t wait when BTR-82A to be added in the game and what will happened
1 Like
I don’t even see that many USHs around anymore, they’re just gone. LRF artillery is the true scourge of this BR range.
Ah, understandable. Those annoying things are just that: annoying, but unfortunately they will never nerf it. They don’t touch American things. Plus, they’ll just nerf the Fox APDS.
2 Likes
I hate it but I think it’s balanced.
Not to mention that they are SILENT.
“this isnt as good as xm800t as a light tank”
it doesn’t matter it will SHRED xm800t atleast in where i play it
the firerate is so good and the fact that you can just push and trash them it also ha sa stab and i never use the apds
use APHE it will trash the xm800t
atleast i have done so and if you cant trash a xm800t with spaa maybe you have a skill issue honestly
we just want to whine instead of do anything to fix the problem
in reality the spaa are all good enough point and click solutions to xm800t
aim, shoot = xm800t is dead
the fact you want to use apds instead of aphe against xm800t tells me a lot
1 Like
fact is it needs to be brought up in BR.
it pens the leopard 1 frontaly. most battles is just xm800t spam.
if it wasnt superb in its br we wouldnt be facing multiple as the first spawn.
2 Likes
which is a leopard 1 problem not an all tanks problem
battleratings arent based on penning 1 low armored tank frontally and then not penning anything else frontally
maybe you should have asked leopard 1 designers to add some more armor, they decided to not care because they thought the heat era would end all armor
theres tanks that are strong against the xm800t and theres ones that are weak
it is just how the game works
maybe they werent thinking 10 years ahead…
yea youre right, but they are based on performance. and when a recon vehicle is destroying entire teams thats called overperforming.
they weren’t and thats not our problem
the leopard 1 is unique in a way where it is balanced to have trash armor but great gun and ammo and other qualities
as such, yes the leopard 1 will have issues against things that shoot at it however it is very good against tanks with heavy armor etc
and xm800t shouldnt go up in a br because it is strong against leopards weaknesses
it is also weak against armor of many tanks at the battlerating
feel free to tell me how common this is with a source because i have a feeling this is just as uncommon as any other light tank with fast cannon doing it
What is your reasoning for XM800T having higher br than Marder 1A3 or same br as Warrior and making it face 9.3 tanks like, T-72, ZTZ96, VBCI or CV9030FIN
This thing has 65mm penetration. Similar to Wiesel, Marder etc. No way its BR should be higher.
I mean 65mm pen? There are BR 3ish vehicles with more powerful autocannons.
the marder 1a3 is extremely slower, and forced to face tanks head on.
you have the type87rcv at 7.7 and has nowhere near the same k/d as the xm800t.
the fact you can get to certain places unnoticed makes it a lot better than most.
not to mention the stabilizer that gives it an advantage against other fast firing lights. the warrior you mention for example has no stab.
makes up for it with remote turret that can be put behind bush, the extreme amount of depression for gun and a missile
however youre gonna have to aim for the turret while the warrior can just ding you center of mass a bit and youre dead due to high density of crew
shoot an aphe at that turret and see what happens, same with the atgm.
yes because shooting a light with no stab makes you at a disadvantage. not to mention the top speed and acceleration of the warrior.