Does the JH-7A have the capacity to carry the KH-29TE?
HF-7 pods are for 90mm rockets, 57mm rockets use HF-1, HF-16 and HF-25
1 Like
Yes, and in fact no KH29Ts have ever been purchased.
2 Likes
I know it’s not a reliable source, but along with the Su-27/Su-30, China also bought some Kh-29TEs, so technically the only thing left to know is if the JH-7A has the system to launch them.
They do and we have solid proof for that.JH-7A can use GB-series guided bomb, PL-12 and Kh-29TE, discuss which mounts JH-7A should use
In fact KH29T is not available.
Now that the YJ-83K and KD-88 are coming in the next update, I wonder if the JH-7A will benefit from it
7 Likes
now that you mention KD-88 for the JH-7 wouldn’t the addition of the agm increase its BR considering the longer range that it has compared to Kh-29?
1 Like
seeker will most likely be incapable of locking moving targets at that far, and variant we have in game is TV, so i think it can stay, it’ll be like Kh-59
1 Like
the KD-88 is also slower for short ranges shots incomparisons to the KH
New JH-7A2
Also did they really butchered the 11.7 CAS just to add another vehicle .3 higher with all the missing ordnance from the A? JH-7A [12.0] vs JH-7A2 [12.3]
8 Likes
Eh, something-something ordinance is a balancing measure (and Snail’s unwillingness to up older jets without strong for it reason)
2 Likes
its fine, the seperation in air is okay, tho i dont understand why they still have base pl8 on that thing
The only nerf kj8602 afaik should actually get is rwr elevation coverage being changed to ±30 degrees from ±45, other than that im pretty sure it’s accurate
Are you saying that the bug report is invalid? if yes then see following if no then ignore
Spoiler
The dude who made the bugreport wants to know where you would see the node for frontal coverage
no frontal node, :
Spoiler
frontal node
Spoiler
1 Like
Do you have a source for this?
Yes, I found that out later.
o7
2 Likes