the environment is not so good, but I believe the plane is good, the only problem is how can I get my PL-5E2, as it’s hard for it to bomb base
1 Like
I farm ground battles with the four KH-29s that can take on the enemy. I farmed PL5E2 very quickly with a good average of 6 vehicles destroyed per game just with the JH-7A
Shouldn’t we also have the slightly better TE rather than T?
what makes those differ in br so much? same airframe, two missiles more… is it really worth a 1.0 br increase?
It’s more that the jh7 is undertiered and should not be 11.3
6 Likes
And probably JH-7A shouldn’t be 12.3. Should really be 11.7 and 12.0, since the difference is minimal.
certainly not with PL-5EIIs, absolutely wild it’s the same BR as Tornados with 9Ls
No.
2 Likes
Why should it be higher than Mirage F1C?
Because it’s a better plane than the F1C and it has more IRCCM missiles
2 Likes
And F1C is faster. JH7s will barely ever get to the base. U got SARHs as well, no matter how bad they are.
3 Likes
So why does the JH-7 get the YJ-81 but the JH-7A’s don’t get it? I think this is the first time I’ve seen them actually add a missile to the older model and not give it to the newer model that is basically the same thing as it.
Because Gaijin doesn’t neglect anything that isn’t Russian, American, or German, the JH-7A can also fire the YJ-81 since it shares the same radar as the JH-7. Perhaps it will give the YJ-81 to the JH-7A in the next update, but the YJ-83 has been mentioned and is more interesting, with greater range, and the YJ-83KH version is IR
1 Like
genuinely asking, why do we want YJ-83K… do you not see the trend gaijin is doing with IR seeker on IR guided anti-ship/cruise missiles like penguin, ASM-2 and Kh-58
Because the K is ARH and smoke-resistant, even though it’s very difficult to hit a tank with a cruise missile, this adds versatility to the missile and allows players to play as they wish. The Japanese have ASM-1 and ASM-2, so why shouldn’t China have its YJ-83K and YJ-83KH? Same missile body, just the seeker to model for less than 10 minutes of work
could the JH-7 carry 57mm rocket pods as one of its secondary armaments? some sites do mention that JH-7 could indeed carry 57mm rockets and they even specify a rocket pod model: HF-7C/D 57 mm
but is there any more specific information about this? like what is the capacity of the mentioned pod? what does it look like? my guess is that the rocket pod is the 16 x 57mm or something similar I have tried to find the designations for the 57mm rocket pods but I found nothing and images are confusing with the designs of the pods, I’d imagine that JH-7 would be able to carry them but JH-7A would defintely ditch them in order to give preference to better weaponry
this rocket pod seems to maybe be the correct one but who knows
1 Like
Does the JH-7A have the capacity to carry the KH-29TE?
HF-7 pods are for 90mm rockets, 57mm rockets use HF-1, HF-16 and HF-25
1 Like
Yes, and in fact no KH29Ts have ever been purchased.
2 Likes
I know it’s not a reliable source, but along with the Su-27/Su-30, China also bought some Kh-29TEs, so technically the only thing left to know is if the JH-7A has the system to launch them.
They do and we have solid proof for that.JH-7A can use GB-series guided bomb, PL-12 and Kh-29TE, discuss which mounts JH-7A should use
In fact KH29T is not available.