WS10B in J10C

Where is the WS10B on the J10C?
image
It was reported on the dev server.
Several bug reports were opened regarding this issue, but nothing was resolved.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bmNmo8rr3Uu9
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9aPALPkyF6yu
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ivG5H8fSF4bI
image
(This is a joke.)

There is an image of the plane using ws10b.
image
image
Why is it not accepted that the fighter jet uses the WS10B?
There is an image, there is a statement on the manufacturer’s website, the export version uses the engine, the display fighters from the Zhuhai and Paris air shows use the engine.
Everything corroborates and indicates that the fighter jet uses the engine, but why don’t you accept it?
Why isn’t this same rigor applied to other vehicles from other nations, such as Russian vehicles, for example?
You talk about primary sources, but maintenance manuals or manufacturer’s manuals are impossible and illegal to obtain. Let’s work with reality and within the law. Sometimes the behavior of moderators and some developers encourages the leaking of sensitive information.

16 Likes

Inb4 closed, this could probably go in the J-10 thread

1 Like

It could use either engine, though I’d much rather have it with ws10b.

2 Likes

Only early batches used AL-31, but since It hasn’t been renamed to “J-10C early”, It should have WS-10B

7 Likes

They’re advertising their shitty AL31F engine.

7 Likes

Jesus

The best al31f derivatives is about on par if not better than the best ws-10 derivatives.
And they get tvc for serial production ones

Defeats the point, that being there is a domestic alternative, one far more iconic with the J-10C.

Just remember how angry people got when the US F-15 had sligntly worse engines than the Israeli one…

The justification for giving it 229s is far more dubious than giving the J-10C it’s WS-10B

1 Like

That’s different as one plane was coming with 229s while the other one wasn’t. There is no other j10c thats getting a different engine, so I don’t see anything wrong with this. Ofc I would rather have it with the ws10b, I’m not saying al31fp serie 3 is better. But the j-10c is good enough for a top tier so imo it’s fine without its best engine

Is it good enough to be ranked higher than the Gripen E?
Or near the EF with AESA, or near SM2? I don’t think so.
And it’s always the same old story whenever a Chinese vehicle is added, ever since the J11A, it’s always the same thing.

7 Likes

Gaijin stated that replacing the WS-10B engine would also require changing the model. As early as the initial developer livestream, they mentioned that the engine might be replaced, but in the end, it’s clear that the J-10C still uses the AL-31FN. During the development server period, Gaijin was able to complete the Su-30SM2 without any leaks and update the JAS 39E from its white model state within a single day. So, why couldn’t they prepare the WS-10B model in advance?

6 Likes

Chinese jets get gimped so often it really ain’t funny anymore
J11A, J10A, and now the J10C

3 Likes

This is the lamest excuse that exists.
If they don’t have the model ready yet, they could just change the thrust values ​​to match the WS10B and then change the model; performance is much more important than the 3D model.
This is just an excuse from Gaijin for not implementing the engine as it should be.

4 Likes

In terms of air-to-ground payloads, Gaijin has long completed the models for the C-704 series of missiles, and the KD-88 series models were also finished during the development server period. However, they show no intention of adding these completed assets into the game, offering only a pitifully small amount of IR LS-6 (250 kg).

c704


kd88



As a side note, the explosive filler mass of Chinese bombs is disappointingly low, and their filler type is even just TNT.

2 Likes

That comes from way before, it took them literal YEARS to give the Q-5L it’s countermeasures.

Also the JH-7A is missing it’s anti-ship missiles and PL-12.

They have still not responded, which is enough to demonstrate their attitude towards the J10C.

1 Like

When it still has such a magical drag?

3 Likes

why does that matter? I have had no trouble going fast in a straight line with the standard j-10a, 1450kph IAS is more than fast enough.

1 Like

Maybe it’s not a problem for you, but for all the other players from the Chinese nation, it’s a problem for us

1 Like

but why? the j-10 can already defend very nicely while launching fox 3s already. Top speed hardly matters