So same issue as the M1128 turning diameter
5 Likes
I can’t see an issue with the video in this instance, we don’t accept videos for turret turn speed etc, basically anything you can speed up to try and cheat a higher speed.
But with a turning circle I cannot see how you could manipulate it to misrepresent it. So yes a video of the vehicle completing the turn would be helpful.
8 Likes
Books with the cover included, or a manual (declassified ofcourse). Also when comparing pictures you need to be really careful to get the ingame example at the same distance and angle.
3 Likes
Greatly appreciate the response.
2 Likes
@他妈的打歪了
Try making another issue with more accurate comparison. This should work if the angle are the same when doing the comparison.
2 Likes
It’s easy to open your mouth and talk, please look at my fourth question, now there is a problem with the model of ZLT11, which causes it to not be able to complete the turn according to the data. So, if Gaijin never admits that they are wrong, apart from providing the manufacturing blueprint, what public information can prove the model wrong in such detail?
5 Likes
Yes, I know that Gaijin generally does not accept speed-related videos,But the apparent difference in the diameter of the turns is a solid piece of evidence, so I have 2 different sources of reliable information, right? If the current model doesn’t reach this angle, it’s clear that there is something wrong with the model, right?
So it’s really a bug, right?
6 Likes
Yes, I know that. However, although the PLA already has a new 8x8 chassis this year, the old 8x8 chassis is still in service, and manuals and other materials are absolutely impossible, that is an act of espionage.
I think the marked data, the photo, a complete U-turn video, this is well enough to prove.Why can’t Gaijin admit it’s a bug?And I don’t think I had any problem using straight lines and extensions in my photos.Unless you want to say that perspective is wrong.
2 Likes
I sincerely ask Gaijin to revisit this issue, and the information, videos, and backgrounds I provide are very clear and reliable.
1 Like
Rather than put the wheels too close to the body, isn’t it possible that they instead made the chassis too wide ?
On the front facing pictures, the lights seem much narrower on the real picture than the ingame one.
If you have the axle track of the real vehicle, and compare it to that of the ingame one, you could first establish with certainty what is wrong, and make a bug report that would be much harder to shutdown on the ground of “It’s right because I say so.”.
Its also too many issues per report. Each issue needs its own report.
The turning circle should be its own report. The physical issues with the model also need breaking into their own reports.
There is nothing to action or forward here, its not a forum. Linking to other issues and asking questions etc isn’t the way to use the CBR.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vXFdTT4OQtZ1
3 Likes
I can understand needing more sources like books or manuals, but the original problem is turn diameter.
It doesn’t matter how fast it does so, the speed at which it turns doesn’t change the angle.
Otherwise as well, if there are multiple issues being reported then it would make sense to report them separately. But they are also relevant to the explanation to the turning diameter.
4 Likes
But that’s a strange circle, isn’t it?
I opened an issue to report the turn diameter error, and then Gaijin replied that the model does not allow it, so the issue you reported “not a bug”
Then I open another issue comparing the real vehicle to the model, reported the model error, and immediately closed my issue and said that I didn’t have enough sources to prove the model wrong.
So could you please tell me what I should do?
if I reopen an issue about a turn diameter error, with that article and video, will it get passed? Or again, because my model must be right, so not a bug?
4 Likes
I’m actually already comparing vehicles to models.If you read carefully, I have already pointed out that the wheels are a little inward, and the distance between the wheels and the chassis is narrow.
As for why I didn’t compare the width of the chassis, because the angle affects the proportional relationship, I used a more reliable straight line to compare the relative position.
Isn’t the root of the whole thing that ridiculous logic?
My model does not allow it, so all the evidence of reality is incorrect, come on, confirm that my model is wrong.
What else can I do? Steal blueprints?
4 Likes
the reverse speed is terrible too. GJ seriously thinks that a T-72 transmission was the inspiration of this vehicle’s gearbox
4 Likes
@ Gunjob
Are there any questions this time?
ZLT11 has the wrong turning diameter // Gaijin.net // Issues
arrogant snail, they just dont like ChinaTT
2 Likes
Welcome to the minor nation club. Britain gets this all the time. We have to write detailed essays, better referenced that some PHD dissertations to even get the most basic issues addressed.
11 Likes
china is always in the minor nation club, it just trun well after… these few version :(
3 Likes
see,again.
TrickZZter
This guy just ignores the objective evidence and insists on that arrogant logic, my model must be correct.
I have given objective evidence from 2 different sources that confirm that the turning radius is wrong, why am I being asked to prove that the model is wrong?
Provide a manufacturing blueprint, right?
8 Likes