Would you want to reverse the RWR change on the dev server

Dev Server Firebirds General Discussion - Dev Server
61

The USSR does not have 60% of victories, where does this figure come from?

I will say briefly: yes, the change is not very good and I do not like it, but to say that on AVERAGE in a random house, where players simply cannot see the tank at CLOSE range or understand that a rocket is flying at them now, the F-15E will be worse than the Su-34 is strange and unwise. For a simple player, the F-15E is easier to master than the Su-34, if you compare just airplanes. Su-34 ~ Su-25SM3 because it does not have a thermal imager (yes, I know that 38 has a thermal imager, but the average player will look for five pixels for about a year).

Although the game has been focusing on the reds lately, it won’t have any GLOBAL impact at all.

About the RWR, I agree, the change is very strange…

62

n1 joke dude
Solo BMV - 60% i dont have full deck.
image
SEP 2 full deck - 37%
image

63

Are you aware of how statistics work?

64

Okay, you got me))))

I also play tank simulator games on the C1 only phahaha

The RWR change is really terrible, but few people have seen the latest change here.

Guys, now the C1 and 2C6 are displayed the SAME WAY.

image
image

2 Likes
65

Yes. And my USSR statistics are still understated.

Thank you for the obvious discoveries that are known to everyone and talked about in the video.

66

If you understood how they worked, you’d recognise that your argument has very little basis in actual statistics. To demonstrate how showing your own stats and then claiming a global winrate of equivalent to your stats is the case: I’ve a winrate of ~40% with the bmp2m and such, so the winrate is surely 40% for the global winrate of Russia. Alternatively, I’ve a 70% winrate with the strv 122b+ so surely the winrate for Sweden is 70% globally.

See the issue?

3 Likes
67

No, C1 was initially displayed (3 days ago) how “?”, now how AAA (ЗА)

68

Are you taking about the pantsir?

69

No, it’s absolutely true!
And if you play 10 fights and win 10 times, it will be 100% and this is undoubtedly the case.
The Russian-speaking blogger (although I don’t really like him, but it’s a great job) has statistics from several thousand fights on the top dash, counting the collection of information with a replay of War Thunder. It shows that the leaders in victories are Sweden, Germany, the USA - the last place, and the USSR in front of them.

2 Likes
70

Yes

71

Guess becouse it has guns it doesn’t count has Sam anymore imagine so much Russian bias it actually hurts now

everyone just need to watch out for AAA instead of Sam or “?”

1 Like
72

Ordinarily, I’d argue against Ruski bias. A lot of stuff is relatively accurate for Russian kit (aside from underperforming air aspects outside of the agms), but this change is pretty blatantly one sided. Pretty rubbish.

73

Legally speaking, yes, this is not a ЗРК(SAM), this is a ZPRK (aaa (gun+missiles)).

74

Then the name should be zprk

But given a rwr is made by the enemy they will probably program it after the more serious threat Which Is missiles

Or do you think the Russians would Programm the Russian rwr to call-out “all-weather multirule Strike fighter” wen they see a f15e?

75

IDK. i thk C1 must be C1… or SA-22, not AAA / ЗА
Just like everything else. It would be much cooler if the designation SA-__ were introduced for NATO, rather than a generalized something

76

image

10 Likes
77

BMP-2M have 12.0 BR?

78

Sure, T80 BVM has a winrate of 50%. So surely Russia only has a 50% winrate globally.

If you cannot see the flaw in your assessment, you really just shouldn’t comment on statistics.

79

U use thunderstat? Its wrong global stat rate.

80

Sad thing is they didn’t anounced that in devblog and devstream. Just silent incertion for change with drasitcaly influence for half of planes, while also not being proved by some general logic of their’s game development.
That upset.